On May 15, it was reported that a WeChat public account article of Xinxiang Institute of Engineering attracted widespread attention on the Internet
The article claims that one of the school's students scored a staggering 97 points in the political subject of the graduate school entrance exam. This high score was not only widely praised on campus, but also aroused heated discussions in major online communities.
It is reported that this student performed well in the political subject of this year's national unified entrance examination for master's students, and stood out with a score of almost full score. Politics is a compulsory subject, and its results are very important for candidates. The political exam consists of two parts, objective and subjective, and it is difficult to get a high score in both parts.
Some netizens said that it is extremely rare to get a high score of 97 points in the political exam, especially considering that the political exam also includes subjective analysis questions, and it is really unbelievable that subjective questions are only deducted 3 points while not losing points on objective questions
As netizens dug deeper, some careful observers found that there seemed to be unusual traces on Li's transcript, suggesting possible data changes
A reporter contacted a number of candidates who had successfully inquired about the results of the 2024 graduate examination, and obtained screenshots of the examination results from them as comparison information
After a series of detailed comparative analysis, an obvious detail surfaced: in all the screenshots of the candidates' scores, the total score value was strictly aligned with the professional code, but Li's total score of 373 points was obviously misaligned with the number of the professional code.
This discovery immediately caused an uproar on the Internet, and many netizens began to question the authenticity of Li's results
The originally eye-catching high score has now become the target of public criticism, and netizens have asked the school and relevant departments to give reasonable explanations
On the afternoon of the 18th, a reporter called the Propaganda Department of Xinxiang Engineering College
The staff of the propaganda department responded with a firm and clear attitude, saying that the school had launched a detailed review of the matter, and the results of the review were shocking: the student's political achievements were not entirely true
The staff member said solemnly and decisively: "We have determined that there is a falsification of this result. I can't give too many details about it at this time. But reassure the public that the school is urgently discussing measures to deal with this serious incident. ”
This incident not only exposed a specific fraud incident, but also brought us far-reaching enlightenment and several aspects that require deep reflection:
First of all, we cannot but see that the ideological, moral, and quality education of today's college students still needs to be strengthened. Honesty and trustworthiness, the traditional virtue of the Chinese nation, should take deeper root in their hearts
We need to use a variety of educational methods to make them more deeply understand that honesty and trustworthiness are not only moral requirements, but also the cornerstone of society.
In addition, we must admit that there are still obvious shortcomings and deficiencies in information verification, auditing and daily supervision of universities and training institutions. The loopholes in these links undoubtedly provide opportunities for illegal acts
Therefore, these organizations not only need to improve the rigor of information management, but also need to demonstrate higher professionalism and resilience in crisis management.
So, what do you think about this? Everyone is welcome to speak freely in the comment section and share your views!