laitimes

Why is the burden reduction in primary and secondary schools not effective? Looking at the current subjects of the high school entrance examination, the reason is already very clear

author:Essay on fungus

Recently, there has been a heated discussion on the Internet, saying that today's students are simply "carrying schoolbags to the battlefield", why? Because the subjects of the high school entrance examination are like a "big expansion of the army", geography, biology, music, art, etc. have joined the battle sequence. But the question is, what about the "burden reduction" that we keep shouting? Why does it feel like "talking on paper", with heavy thunder and little rain?

Loading...

First of all, let's talk about the increase in subjects in the high school entrance examination. In the past, there were only a few courses in the high school entrance examination, and students could still take a breath. What now? There are so many subjects that students have to spin around like a spinning top. I memorized words in the morning, practiced physics in the afternoon, and memorized history in the evening. What about parents? It's also heartbroken, and the cram schools are reported one after another, for fear that the children will fall behind. But the result? The students' school bags are getting heavier and heavier, their eyes are becoming more and more short-sighted, and the psychological pressure is increasing.

Why is the burden reduction in primary and secondary schools not effective? Looking at the current subjects of the high school entrance examination, the reason is already very clear

Let's talk about this educational philosophy. Hasn't our country always advocated quality education? Why do you feel that you have taken the old road of responding to the examination education again? Music and art, which are supposed to cultivate sentiment, have also become part of the "test-taking". If this continues, how can students still feel the charm of art? They just know that they have to get high grades and go to good schools. Can this kind of "cramming" education really cultivate talents with innovative spirit and practical ability?

Why is the burden reduction in primary and secondary schools not effective? Looking at the current subjects of the high school entrance examination, the reason is already very clear

Also, the teacher's side is also under a lot of pressure. In the past, one course was taught for one semester, but now it is good, there are more subjects, and there is still so much time. In order to complete the teaching task, teachers can only compress the class time and increase the amount of homework. In this way, the students are tired of learning, and the teachers are also tired of teaching. In the long run, can the quality of education really be guaranteed?

Why is the burden reduction in primary and secondary schools not effective? Looking at the current subjects of the high school entrance examination, the reason is already very clear

So the question is, is this slogan of "reducing the burden" just a shout? In fact, it is not entirely to blame the policy for not being effective. You must know that the pressure of social competition is so great, and parents have never stopped hoping that their sons will become dragons and their daughters will become phoenixes. They want their children to go to good schools, get good jobs, and have a good life. Therefore, even if the school reduces the burden of schoolwork, parents will still increase the number of children and sign up for various cram classes and interest classes. In this way, the effect of reducing the burden will naturally be greatly reduced.

Why is the burden reduction in primary and secondary schools not effective? Looking at the current subjects of the high school entrance examination, the reason is already very clear

So what to do? I think that if you want to really reduce the burden, you have to solve the problem at the root. First of all, we have to change the concept of "one test for life". Although the high school entrance examination and college entrance examination are important, they are not the only way out. We have to let our children know that there are infinite possibilities in life, and there is not only one way to study. Second, quality education must be strengthened. Don't always stare at the scores, you have to pay attention to cultivating children's comprehensive quality and innovation ability. Finally, we need to make educational resources more balanced. Don't let all the good schools and teachers be concentrated in the city or a few places. In this way, everyone doesn't have to squeeze their heads so desperately.

Why is the burden reduction in primary and secondary schools not effective? Looking at the current subjects of the high school entrance examination, the reason is already very clear

Of course, this is not something that can be solved in a day or two. It requires the joint efforts of schools, parents and society. But having said that, the "big expansion" of the high school entrance examination subjects really made us see the difficulties on the road to reducing the burden. However, as long as we work together, face difficulties, and continue to innovate and practice new educational methods and concepts, then I believe that one day in the future, we will be able to achieve real "burden reduction"!

Read on