laitimes

The performance of the contestants of the "2024 Chinese Poetry Conference" is disappointing, 300,000, 3 months at this level?

author:The owner of the water workshop

The performance of the contestants of the "2024 Chinese Poetry Conference" is disappointing, 300,000, 3 months at this level?

The performance of the contestants of the "2024 Chinese Poetry Conference" is disappointing, 300,000, 3 months at this level?

"2024 Chinese Poetry Conference" has been broadcast 8 times, and a common feeling is that the level of this year's contestants is declining off a cliff. Although this year's main focus is a team competition, the theme of each game is different, the exam questions are self-contained, and the number of games is not related to each other, in other words, the broadcast sequence is disrupted, which will not affect the results of the players, and will not have a bad experience for the audience, but the strength of the players in the 100-person group can basically be seen.

The performance of the contestants of the "2024 Chinese Poetry Conference" is disappointing, 300,000, 3 months at this level?

Let's take a look at a set of data first, 8 players play in each game, there are a total of 64 players in 8 games, except for the repeated players in it, there are actually 52 players. There are 100 people in the 100-person group, and there are still 48 people who have not appeared, there are only 2 games left in the game, and the last 1 is the finals, assuming that the 9th game is full of newcomers, and there are only 8 places, and in the end there are still 40 people who have no chance to play at all, more than one-third. At present, 52 players are ranked in the top five in individual points: Shen Hao, Wang Chenhao, Chen Qiushi, Xiao Yuxiang, and Wu Ziqing.

The performance of the contestants of the "2024 Chinese Poetry Conference" is disappointing, 300,000, 3 months at this level?

Among them, Shen Hao and Wang Chenhao, who ranked in the top one and two, both played 3 times, and their personal points exceeded 15 points. The third place Chen Qiushi played 2 games, and his personal points were only 2 points less than Wang Chenhao, and the third place Chen Qiushi also played 2 games, and his personal points were not up or down, and Xiao Yuxiang and Wu Zijing, who were in the fourth and fifth places, had little difference in personal points. It shows that the overall level of this year's players is not high, on the one hand, there are few returns, personal ability is not outstanding, and the knowledge points are one-sided; Another aspect is that there is not much difference between the players.

The performance of the contestants of the "2024 Chinese Poetry Conference" is disappointing, 300,000, 3 months at this level?

Why? Because whether it is Wang Chenhao or Shen Hao, they both have their own strengths and weaknesses in the game, and they have not reached the level of making great progress all the way in the whole game, and even making people applaud. Wang Chenhao's basic knowledge is okay, his hand speed is okay, and he has more points for answering questions, but Feihualing's performance is average. Shen Hao is the most comprehensive one, and every time he flies to the end, he has a good answer to the question, and he has a personal record of scoring 6 points in a row. Hu Jiajie is also representative, only in the last scene, there is a poem in the painting and scored 7 points, but Feihua Ling was the first to go out.

The performance of the contestants of the "2024 Chinese Poetry Conference" is disappointing, 300,000, 3 months at this level?

The knowledge of the players is not comprehensive, and they don't know one thing but they don't know the other, which greatly reduces the confrontation and professionalism of the game on the field. Especially in the "Big Waves and Sands" link, there are 4 questions per session, which is generally considered to be not very difficult, and some are even given points. Often the audience can answer the right questions, but the players on the field don't know what to say, it's unbelievable. The situation of killing more than half of the number of people in the first question has been common in this competition, especially the players of the children's group who lost the most points in the "big waves and sand".

The performance of the contestants of the "2024 Chinese Poetry Conference" is disappointing, 300,000, 3 months at this level?

In the "Thousands of People and Thousands of Questions" session, although there is no standard answer, it seems that it is the easiest to score, but in the sixth and seventh games, the poems given by the two teams are not closely related to the topic, and the answers are not the best, and the voting results of the Thousand People Group in the Cloud are even more perfunctory. There is also the "Flying Flower Order" link, which was originally the most anticipated by the audience, and it is also the biggest attraction of the "Chinese Poetry Conference", but this year is really too stretched, and it is a pity that I did not see Lei Haiwei, Wu Yishu, Chen Geng, Xiang Zhiyi, Ma Baoli The real poetry masters.

The performance of the contestants of the "2024 Chinese Poetry Conference" is disappointing, 300,000, 3 months at this level?

Moreover, many of the keywords of this year's "Flying Flower Order" have been tested in previous years, and the players who persevered to the end of the team have one more chance to ask for help, which is equivalent to an open-book exam with reduced difficulty. In fact, the contestants didn't fly for a few rounds before they got stuck, and they didn't show the charm of the "Flying Flower Order" question type at all, and the overall performance was disappointing. In this situation, I can't help but ask the soul torture: Are the players of this season's 100-person group really selected from nearly 300,000 registered players after 3 months?

The performance of the contestants of the "2024 Chinese Poetry Conference" is disappointing, 300,000, 3 months at this level?

#2024中国诗词大会#

Read on