Before reading this article, I sincerely invite you to click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also brings you a different sense of participation, and it is more convenient to come back at any time to read more exciting content, thank you for your support.
In recent years, the United States has been hyping up topics such as national security and the China threat theory, wantonly exaggerating the negative impact of China's development on the United States, and has repeatedly imposed unwarranted sanctions and suppression on China.
The United States is constantly decoupling from China in action by means of unilateral hegemony and trying to cut ties with China.
What the United States is doing is actually aimed at "de-Sinicization" and not allowing China to develop in the fields of economy, science and technology, so as to prevent China's development in these fields from affecting US hegemony.
Therefore, the United States takes advantage of its hegemonic position in the world to impose sanctions and suppression on China at every turn, and although it says that it will not decouple from China and hopes to maintain a stable cooperative relationship with China, its actual actions always violate the commitments it has made.
Recently, the US Government has sent two important officials to visit China. Whether it is Yellen or Blinken, they have a high voice in American politics.
On the surface, the US government is sending politicians to China to seek dialogue and handle Sino-US relations with a more relaxed relationship, but behind the scenes, it is constantly unfolding unprincipled sanctions and provoking China's bottom line again and again.
The inconsistency between the words and deeds of the United States has also made the outside world feel that such a superpower has always gone back on its word.
This behavior was repeated after the visit of Yellen and Blinken officials to China.
During Yellen's visit to China, she fully expressed the U.S. strategy of not decoupling from China, and said that the U.S. and China must have very close economic ties, and the U.S. has never sought to decouple from China in these areas.
However, what Yellen is talking about without decoupling is actually asking China to unilaterally contribute to U.S. economic interests.
Non-decoupling is only about ensuring U.S. interests, but not allowing China to benefit from them.
At the same time, the discussion continues to blame China for overcapacity, and says that China has a serious surplus in some industrial manufacturing products such as new energy.
The fact that more and more Chinese goods are pouring into the international market has affected the interests of American businesses, causing the incomes of American workers to fall.
Like Yellen, Blinken remained more hawkish during his visit to China.
In fact, Blinken was fully prepared before his visit to China, not only continuing to provide support to Ukraine, but also demanding that China sever ties with Russia.
It even condemned China for providing military and civilian supplies to Russia and blocking China's cooperation with Iranian oil.
After laying the groundwork for these things, Blinken embarked on a trip to China. Originally, Blinken came with the purpose of negotiating with China, and Blinken also made promises during his visit to China.
He even said that he would work with China to manage economic risks and seek development together.
In fact, Blinken's statement was soon slapped in the face. Biden then showed three cards to China, not allowing mainland companies to provide broadband services in the United States, and at the same time, he is also trying to attract Japan and the European Union to continue to impose export controls on the semiconductor industry.
And Yellen has previously said that the U.S. government will take all measures to deal with China's overcapacity.
It is clear that the promises made by Blinken in China have completely lapsed. This is also completely in line with the consistent practice of the United States to go back on its word.
In recent years, the United States has imposed strict controls on Chinese companies in the semiconductor industry, especially in the context of the continuous development of Chinese technology companies, and the US government has tried to curb the development of these companies.
It not only requires high-end chip manufacturers in the United States to refuse to cooperate with Chinese companies, but also establishes chip alliances, requiring some chip semiconductor companies such as the Netherlands, Japan and South Korea to refuse to provide high-end products to the Chinese market.
The U.S. government is trying to use these means to build up China's science and technology in all aspects. And now the U.S. government has once again tightened sanctions on the semiconductor industry, hoping to hit China's technology sector hard.
In fact, the crisis that the United States is now facing is entirely caused by the U.S. government.
In the past years, the mainland manufacturing industry has indeed made great progress, with cheap labor, coupled with the rapid development of the mainland's manufacturing industry, to provide the world with a lot of cost-effective products.
In the trade between China and the United States, China is exporting more and more cost-effective products to the United States, which has also allowed the United States to enjoy real benefits. And the United States only needs to print a lot of money to get these physical objects easily.
However, the U.S. government was not satisfied, and not only launched an economic and trade war against the mainland, but also prevented the development of mainland technology enterprises.
And those cost-effective products cannot enter the United States, further exacerbating the inflation problem in the United States.
Although the Federal Reserve has raised interest rates several times, the United States is still facing very severe inflation. In the face of these problems, the US government has not done a reflection and continues to point the finger at China.
In response to the sanctions and suppression of the United States, only by continuously increasing development efforts and mastering core technologies can China better deal with the United States and no longer be stuck by Western countries.
What is your view on Sino-US relations? Welcome to discuss in the comment area!