In this era of intensifying price wars, who would have thought that a simple campus snack shop would cause such an uproar?
Mr. Li, an investor, spent millions of dollars to open a snack shop, but who knew that he was ordered to close by the school after only two days of operation, because the price was too low?
What is puzzling is that the school actually asked Mr. Li to readjust the price on this ground, and even rejected his application to open a store twice in a row. What kind of operation is this?
We all know that low-cost snacks are undoubtedly very popular for the student population. After all, most students don't have enough pocket money on hand and want to buy their favorite snacks at a lower price.
Mr. Li's snack shop, based on this characteristic of the student body, offers quite favorable prices, so it has attracted the attention of many students. However, the school was dissatisfied with this, and even directly asked Mr. Li to close the shop on the grounds that the price was too low.
This is really puzzling. After all, shouldn't its priority as a university be to provide students with better service and a better selection of goods?
However, the reality is the opposite, and schools would rather choose to protect their own interests than prevent students from enjoying affordable snacks. This can't help but make people wonder if there is something unknown behind the school.
It is reported that the reason given by the school is that the price of Mr. Li's snacks is too low, which affects the business of the school's supermarket. But this has to make people wonder if the school supermarket is really run for the benefit of students?
After all, if that's the case, then why would a school block the opening of a more affordable snack shop?
What's even more puzzling is that after Mr. Li tried to communicate and coordinate with the school many times, the school was still unmoved, and even rejected his application to open a store twice in a row.
This undoubtedly caused a huge loss to Mr. Li's business, and at the same time, the majority of students were unable to enjoy preferential snacks. I have to say that such an approach is really uproaring.
In addition, some netizens broke the news that there had been a dog abuse incident in this school before, coupled with this snack shop incident, it can't help but make people wonder if there are some unknown cats in this school.
After all, why did a university fall to such a point where it should not be supposed to be a fair and equitable learning environment?
In any case, this matter has aroused widespread social concern. Many netizens expressed their support for Mr. Li's approach, believing that the school's approach was very unfair.
Some people even said that if the school does not let Mr. Li open a store again, then he might as well open it in a different place, or simply open an identical snack shop opposite the school and fight directly with the school supermarket.
It can be said that this incident not only involves the contradiction between the school and the business, but also reflects some problems in the internal management of colleges and universities.
If there were people who thought that universities were a fair and just learning environment, then this may raise suspicions. Let's wait and see what the outcome will be.
【Disclaimer】
The process and pictures described in the article are all from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance.
If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible!
If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact