⊙ pet was assassinated by the Kuizi battalion, which coincides with the assassination of Ma Xinyi by the Hunan army group in history. The movie does not point this point directly, but uses a curved pen. This is also related to the fact that this historical fact is an inference.
⊙ pet was actually tricked by the upper echelons. The reason why the pet can get up is because there are people in his hands, as the movie says, if Lord Chen does not have 1,500 soldiers in his hands, he will have no confidence to speak in the court. The real strength in the pet hands is Zhao Erhu and Jiang Wuyang and their children. And Zhao Erhu is the backbone of these people. After killing Zhao, the pet lost the support of these people and became a lonely person, so it was naturally impossible to escape death. This is a discord meter. Pets are betrayed by relatives, and death is quite pitiful. However, the pet is a smart person, but he didn't see such a simple truth, so that he destroyed the Great Wall. It can only show that the screenwriter is too crotch-pulling, and his ability is a problem.
⊙ pet understands politics but doesn't understand human feelings, Zhao understands human feelings but doesn't understand politics, and Jiang understands everything but doesn't understand anything.
⊙ this movie is really technically refined, but the narrative is not in place, and it is scattered. Each paragraph does its own thing, and it is unclear what to do in one place.
The story line of Pet and Lian really doesn't seem to contribute to the whole film. What kind of character this lotus is, I don't see it, how can I sleep with my pet as soon as we meet, I feel that this person is headless and brainless. What does it have to do with Zhao Erhu, I don't see it, from the movie, it is also quite affectionate, more affectionate than pets. Such a brilliant character is made up of mediocre extremes, and his acting is as plain as water.
Killing two small soldiers who violated discipline, there was no foreshadowing in front of them, and they suddenly came out, which made people feel punished without teaching, and the portrayal of the character of pet only made people feel very abrupt. It's hard to be convincing when you suddenly get to the bottom of a big truth. For such a major character, it is a major mistake to have a sense of jump cut, and I don't know how those eight screenwriters worked.
⊙ using Jiang's narration to assist in the characterization of the pet is really a way for the screenwriter to cut corners. It may be that large sections of war scenes take up too much space and do not have enough time to build up the plot.
⊙ this movie is confusing after watching it, and after watching it twice, you will find that there are too many loopholes. The movie does have a grand structure, which is deeper than Zhang Che and Ping Jiang Buxiaosheng's intentions. But the screenwriter's ability is still not the same as the two predecessors above. It's a pity that there is such a strong service team and photography team.