laitimes

Is it justified to defend the conflict between the student and the drunkard who was detained, and his father was willing to pay medical expenses to settle the settlement?

author:Uncle Rongzhou

On the evening of March 31, there was a clash between three drunks and students in Jinan Electronic and Mechanical Engineering School. Student Xiaochao was criminally detained on suspicion of intentional injury, the incident continued to ferment, the comment area of the official account of the Jinan Public Security Bureau fell, and the case is currently being upgraded to a higher level, and Xiaochao's father is handling bail pending trial for his son.

Is it justified to defend the conflict between the student and the drunkard who was detained, and his father was willing to pay medical expenses to settle the settlement?

Xiaochao's father said that at around 8 p.m. on March 31, a female student on campus was provoked by three drunk men outside the school while taking takeout. Xiao Chao and two other male classmates stepped forward to stop, and 3 drunks had a verbal conflict, three drunk men forcibly broke into the campus, one of the men stepped forward to choke Xiao Chao's neck, Xiao Chao punched back, knocked the man to the ground, the man hit the ground with his head, was diagnosed with brain herniation by the hospital, and did a craniotomy, on April 1, Xiao Chao was criminally detained on suspicion of intentional injury.

Is it justified to defend the conflict between the student and the drunkard who was detained, and his father was willing to pay medical expenses to settle the settlement?

Xiaochao's father said that his son had practiced sanda for a period of time before, and it was the first person from outside the school to do it, and his son and the girl (who took the takeaway) did not know each other, and thought that his son was justified in self-defense. After learning that the other party was injured and hospitalized, he twice tried to contact the victim's family through the police, and was willing to pay for treatment to express his settlement, but the other party was unwilling to see him.

Is it justified to defend the conflict between the student and the drunkard who was detained, and his father was willing to pay medical expenses to settle the settlement?

The Jinan Municipal Public Security Bureau High-tech Industrial Development Zone Bureau responded that it was inconvenient to introduce the progress of Xiaochao's release on bail pending trial, and the official notice shall prevail.

Is it justified to defend the conflict between the student and the drunkard who was detained, and his father was willing to pay medical expenses to settle the settlement?

Some netizens questioned: "If you are justified in defense, there is no need to pay for reconciliation." What is Xiao Chao's father afraid of? Isn't Xiao Chao justified in self-defense?", "Is it justified self-defense? The management of this school is too bad!", "What is the identity of the three drunkards? Do they have any criminal records? Why don't they say a word? Why don't the police ask about such hooligans causing trouble?", "Why do we want to reconcile? If the whole society is like this, who will act bravely?" ......

Is it justified to defend the conflict between the student and the drunkard who was detained, and his father was willing to pay medical expenses to settle the settlement?

Some netizens said: "Can outsiders from this school come and go freely?", "This is a typical act of righteousness and courage! Who will dare to stand up when you see a woman molesting women in the future?", "Since it is a legitimate defense and courageous act, why are you willing to bear the medical expenses of the injured?", "Why do you want to reconcile? Is it to give in? Or is there pressure from someone?", "This is a serious blow to the act of righteousness and courage!", "Who is blocking the way for righteousness and courage? Who will act bravely in the future? Where is justice?......

Is it justified to defend the conflict between the student and the drunkard who was detained, and his father was willing to pay medical expenses to settle the settlement?

Judging from the reactions of netizens, the main focus is whether the student's behavior is justified in self-defense, and if so, why should his father give in? If not, why is the police investigating so slowly and the case is complicated?

Personally, I believe that whether this incident is justified or not, the police should respond to social concerns in a timely manner. If not, give sufficient evidence, and if so, has it exceeded the necessary limit?

Is it justified to defend the conflict between the student and the drunkard who was detained, and his father was willing to pay medical expenses to settle the settlement?

As the father of the child, the first concern is that the child's safety and future prospects will not be affected, which is understandable and should be supported, because leaving a case record, the child's future may be ruined, the family's years of efforts may come to naught, and even the next generation will be affected.

The case itself is not complicated, but the impact is very large, and the whole society is paying attention to it, so it is necessary to handle an ironclad case without controversy, so that people can uphold social fairness and justice, and social conscience must not be harmed.

What are your thoughts on this?

Read on