#时事热点头条说#
Some netizens posted, saying that cat abuse students also have the right to receive education, originally thought that such a serious comment should make some people realize their mistakes, but netizens' comments on this matter are simply ridiculous!
Even if I don't look at it from the perspective of other netizens, I can refute this netizen's statement alone, the right to education refers to compulsory education, not quality education, and universities and schools all belong to the category of quality education, so schools are screening for students.
As a more common example, if a student can't get into college, do you want to use the student's right to education to force the major schools to admit the student?
(The pictures in this article are all from the Internet)
Everyone can understand the truth, but someone wants to make a joke, I don't know what they want to express? Maybe the netizen just felt sympathy for the cat abuse student from the heart, so as a sympathetic person, some netizens also proposed a plan, which is very good.
This netizen commented, you can vouch for him, I have to say, this proposal is very realistic, if he can't give the other party a guarantee, don't dare to be confident enough, no matter what the reason is, it is not enough to show his kindness.
So, in order to maintain his own good thoughts, does the netizen want to make a guarantee to the cat abuse students? Obviously, the netizen used logic to defeat the straightforwardness of logic, which was approved by more people.
It was also mentioned that although there are no specific regulations on the abuse of cats and animals, the law itself is the bottom line of morality. This also means that you can not be a good person, but if you choose to be a bad person, then you will definitely accept punishment, and this is the price.
The level of morality also reflects the level of civilization from the side, because morality is the benchmark of people's hearts, for right and wrong, good and evil, people have their own judgment, if everyone acts according to the bottom line, this is not a good phenomenon, this will not be a phenomenon we want ourselves or our children to see.
Is it because he abuses cats that he doesn't deserve to continue going to school? This view is the soul torture of many people. But the key to the matter was mistaken, whether he could go to graduate school or not, and the connection between his cat abuse, even the university did not give a specific reply, so don't emphasize that he was not admitted to graduate school because of cat abuse.
The first time was based on comprehensive consideration, the school chose to refuse, and the second time he was screened without even entering the assessment of ideology and morality. Why is this so? It is simply because the school has more suitable people, and among the candidates in the same period, there are more suitable students than him.
Could it be that because he was criticized by netizens for abusing cats, some netizens felt that he was pitiful, and they wanted to deprive other students of the opportunity to study?
Graduate admission, there is a number of indicators, and admitting this one may mean that other people are deprived of opportunities.
So ask yourself, for students who have similar grades to him but have no moral problems, just because other classmates are sympathetic and their opportunities are replaced, what kind of feelings will they feel?
What if the student being replaced is a relative of yours, a child of your relative, or even your own?
Opportunity cost is inherently hidden and not easily visible. But if you do something wrong, once it is considered wrong by many people, then even if there is no rule on how to punish it, it cannot be right!
The comments of netizens are wonderful because they are telling the truth, and only the truth will make people so relieved and sigh!
Instead of questioning the differential treatment of the right to education, netizens who are indignant about the abuse of cats should think about why not all people can be admitted to universities! Perhaps this question, a little more practical, can also give them the real answer to their own questions.