Have you found a strange phenomenon, as long as there are reports of quality problems in Wahaha and Nongfu Spring, the spearhead of netizens is unanimously pointed at Nongfu Spring.
When there is news of quality problems in Nongfu Spring, there will be two voices:
But when Wahaha has quality problems, there will also be two voices:
A few days ago, a netizen posted a video to break the news, saying that there was a black cockroach-like thing in Wahaha's nutrition express, and later after the merchant's investigation, it was found that it was a collision during transportation, which loosened the bottle cap and entered the air, causing the drink to be black and lumpy.
This is a very normal consumer rights protection behavior, but some people said that it was deliberately deceived to frame Wahaha, saying that the netizen who broke the news had already opened the bottle cap.
Some netizens even came up with a tutorial on how to open the bottle cap without being damaged by ensuring that the pull ring under the bottle cap is not damaged, and only need to replace it with another bottle cap that has not been opened.
Could it be that the netizen who broke the news, when Wahaha's legal department eats white food, will use fraud to slander Wahaha, what is the benefit of him doing this, is it really like some netizens said, Nongfu Spring used capital to buy these people who broke the news?
When maggots appeared in the burst bottle of Nongfu Spring, why didn't anyone suspect that someone was framing Nongfu Spring, but only blamed the water for problems. Some people also said that he directed and acted by himself, wanting people to think that Wahaha was framing him.
Nongfu Spring's Oriental Leaves, which sold out 50,000 boxes in 17 hours, were said to have been snatched up by Nongfu Spring's insiders, is it necessary for them to do so?
Is it true that if Nongfu Spring is easy to sell, it will really sell well, and this is not a sale of a house, whether the drink sells well or not, isn't it decided whether consumers like it or not?
It was originally a very normal thing, but it happened to different brands, and two completely different statements were given, this kind of normal consumer feedback event is full of conspiracy theories, capital control at every turn, and netizens are cheating at every turn.
The initiators of these conspiracy theories are just currying favor with public opinion and deceiving traffic, and these conspiracy theories affect not only consumers' correct choice of products, but also the judgment of merchants on the market and the control of product quality.