Text/Sima Nan
△
Let's take two screenshots first, I don't know if the leaders of Hainan Radio and Television Station have seen it?
The host of the Japanese political talk program has not been suspended, and Hu Xijin, as the recently retired editor-in-chief of the Global Times, has not been punished in any way. In the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Zhu Mouqin, a famous professor in Shanghai, cursed the Wenchuan earthquake as a curse (he was busy cooking in the morning, and he didn't find a screenshot for a while), and Shanghai did not do anything. Hainan Radio and Television Station puts forward higher requirements for its hosts, what are the considerations?
△
It was Japanese militarism that invaded China, not the current Japanese, but the Japanese government refused to make a deep reflection on hurting the Chinese, and is still hostile to China, and sharpening its knives, which is equivalent to pouring salt on the wounds of history.
Requiring Chinese people to have diplomatic etiquette is not necessarily possible. has always been polite, but when I see you, I can't do it as a Japanese political commentator with a pouting ass, and I can't do it with Lao Hu, let alone ordinary Chinese?
△
Can it be said that the bell must be tied to the bell, and the Japanese government should reflect on its own reasons?
Can we urge the Japanese side to reflect on itself?
△
Looking at the problem from a larger perspective, maintaining long-term peaceful and friendly relations between China and Japan is in the fundamental interests of the two peoples and the need to maintain peace and stability in Asia and the world.
△
We should think and plan the relationship between the two countries from a historical perspective and a global perspective, mutual respect is the basic premise, and Hainan TV Station is to implement family law when dealing with its own hosts.
△
Correctly treating and profoundly reflecting on the history of Japanese militarist aggression is an important political foundation for establishing and developing Sino-Japanese relations. The inhumane acts of aggression, heinous massacres, and barbaric and frenzied plundering and destruction of Japanese militarism have brought untold disasters to the Chinese people and the people of the vast number of Asian countries. Facts cannot be erased, nor can they be erased. Any remarks denying the history of aggression or even beautifying the war of aggression and colonial rule cannot but arouse great indignation, stern condemnation, and high vigilance among the Chinese people and the people of Asian countries.
In the midst of indignation and vigilance, will it be better to have two sentences of proportionate and well-intentioned reminders from leaders with superb policy levels than public and serious punishments?
△
To commemorate the victory of the Chinese in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, condemn the brutality of the aggressors, and emphasize that remembering historical experiences and lessons is certainly not to perpetuate hatred, but to arouse the yearning and adherence of good people for peace. However, this kind of reminder can be either a bodhisattva with a low brow or a vajra glare.
△
Don't refuse the truth, don't hide the truth, don't take hypocrisy as a routine, don't be like my old friend, move up and down, left and right, 1,000 nuclear bombs for a while, take down Pelosi's landline for a while, scold Japan for being punished by God for a while, and support Hainan Radio and Television Station to implement family law for a while. While Japan-China relations are important, there are also challenges, and it is important to maintain dialogue. It is equally important to maintain people-to-people dialogue. Maintaining people-to-people dialogue is by no means just saying good things, nor is it a kick in the sky or a kick in the ground that will stun the Japanese.
△
The Sino-Japanese dialogue must be based on principles, and both sides should earnestly abide by the relevant provisions of the Japan-China Treaty of Peace and Friendship. You can't claim that "if there is something wrong with Taiwan, there is something wrong with Japan", and you can break the pacifist constitution and threaten Beijing with a 2,000-kilometer missile, I still follow your example, pouting my ass and talking about diplomatic etiquette, right?
△
In 2023, a Japanese spy will be caught in a major newspaper in Beijing, who is about the same age as me, with a Yamada beard, and has been lurking for decades, and the Japanese official media has not said less vicious things.
△
The conflict between the two countries is still going on over issues such as the discharge of nuclear contaminated water from Fukushima into the sea, and many Japanese public's misconceptions about the ownership of the Diaoyu Islands have led to the "China threat" theory being confirmed in Japan, so that they support strengthening the US-Japan alliance, promoting the so-called "free and open Indo-Pacific", and uniting more countries to deter China militarily.
△
In addition, Japan's new version of the "National Security Strategy" and its military operations under vigorous development are completely contrary to the Sino-Japanese Treaty of Peace and Friendship, which is an extremely dangerous trend in Sino-Japanese relations. When Hainan Radio and Television Station deals with its own hosts, if it can take into account the above many complex factors, have a little international vision, a little sense of the overall situation, a little political acumen, a little sense of the network, foresee the reaction of the network, and have a basic affirmation of the simple patriotic enthusiasm of the people, it may be different in terms of wording and handling methods.
In other words, complex issues cannot be dealt with simply.
The handling of complex problems should not be considered too simply.
Sensitive and major international political issues and ideological struggle issues are handled only from the perspective of civilized and polite primary school students' rules and regulations, which is difficult to be self-consistent and difficult to convince the public.
(Written before breakfast on January 5, 2024 in Nanshufang, Dongcheng District, Beijing)