Recently, the Oriental Selection Platform has once again become the focus of public opinion, and the remarks of an anchor Tianquan have attracted widespread attention.
This incident was jokingly called "the second Li Jiaqi" by many netizens, which once again sparked a discussion on the norms and professional ethics of the anchor industry. As a platform, Dongfang Selection has also fallen into a turmoil.
First of all, the cause of the incident was that the anchor Tianquan mocked some viewers during the live broadcast, which caused a lot of controversy.
This kind of inappropriate remarks in the live broadcast sparked public dissatisfaction, and netizens expressed concerns about the professional ethics of the anchors. After the Li Jiaqi incident, the entire anchor industry was already questioned, and this incident made people doubt the quality and professionalism of the anchor.
Secondly, the way the Oriental Selection Platform has taken to deal with this matter has also attracted much attention.
For similar incidents, the platform needs to weigh the host's personal freedom of speech and the platform's standardized management. In some incidents in the past, some platforms have adopted strict measures such as blocking and terminating contracts, while some platforms have chosen to deal with them in the form of education and guidance. This has also sparked widespread controversy about the responsibility of the platform and the rights and interests of anchors.
The occurrence of this incident once again triggered people's thinking about the self-discipline mechanism of the anchor industry.
In the era of Internet live broadcasting, the anchor is the most direct interaction with users on the platform, and his words and deeds are directly related to the reputation and user experience of the platform. Therefore, the anchor industry needs to establish a more rigorous self-discipline mechanism to regulate the words and deeds of anchors and prevent the recurrence of similar incidents. This is also a problem that needs to be solved urgently in the development of the entire industry.
It is worth mentioning that the transparency of the Oriental Selection Platform in handling this matter is also particularly important for users and the public concerned about this matter. The platform needs to respond to users' concerns and questions in an open and transparent manner, and inform everyone of the specific process of the incident and the measures taken. This helps to calm the public's sentiment and maintain the platform's reputation.
Judging from the whole incident, the establishment of standardized management and self-discipline mechanisms in the anchor industry needs to be strengthened urgently. In addition to the supervision of the platform side, industry associations, guilds and other organizations also need to play a greater role and work together to maintain the good image of the entire industry. Only through the joint efforts of the whole industry can the anchor industry develop more healthily and sustainably.
On the whole, the Dongfang selection anchor Tianquan incident once again reminds us that the anchor industry needs to establish a stricter regulation and self-discipline mechanism.
Platforms need to be more cautious and transparent in dealing with similar incidents, and the industry as a whole needs to work together to strengthen its own management and supervision. Only in this way can we ensure that the anchor industry develops in a more standardized and healthy direction and provides users with better services.