laitimes

Aristotle can of course question it, but at least please read the word "sha" in the papyrus accurately and say that the "Western pseudo-historiography" on the Internet has questioned the existence of Aristotle, arguing that it is in XIII

author:Brother Gao talks about history

Aristotle could have questioned it, of course, but at least pronounce the word "sha" in the papyrus

The existence of Aristotle has been questioned by online "Western pseudo-historiography" critics, arguing that it was not mentioned before the thirteenth century, but that it was actually mentioned as early as the Arab Empire and the Eastern Roman Empire. They thought that Aristotle was knowledgeable, but in fact ancient generalists such as Descartes and Leibniz behaved similarly. They think that the knowledge of these people is all false trust of later generations, but this is a misunderstanding of the level of knowledge of ancient times. This argument has a negative impact on young people and therefore needs to be refuted.

Aristotle can of course question it, but at least please read the word "sha" in the papyrus accurately and say that the "Western pseudo-historiography" on the Internet has questioned the existence of Aristotle, arguing that it is in XIII
Aristotle can of course question it, but at least please read the word "sha" in the papyrus accurately and say that the "Western pseudo-historiography" on the Internet has questioned the existence of Aristotle, arguing that it is in XIII
Aristotle can of course question it, but at least please read the word "sha" in the papyrus accurately and say that the "Western pseudo-historiography" on the Internet has questioned the existence of Aristotle, arguing that it is in XIII
Aristotle can of course question it, but at least please read the word "sha" in the papyrus accurately and say that the "Western pseudo-historiography" on the Internet has questioned the existence of Aristotle, arguing that it is in XIII
Aristotle can of course question it, but at least please read the word "sha" in the papyrus accurately and say that the "Western pseudo-historiography" on the Internet has questioned the existence of Aristotle, arguing that it is in XIII
Aristotle can of course question it, but at least please read the word "sha" in the papyrus accurately and say that the "Western pseudo-historiography" on the Internet has questioned the existence of Aristotle, arguing that it is in XIII
Aristotle can of course question it, but at least please read the word "sha" in the papyrus accurately and say that the "Western pseudo-historiography" on the Internet has questioned the existence of Aristotle, arguing that it is in XIII
Aristotle can of course question it, but at least please read the word "sha" in the papyrus accurately and say that the "Western pseudo-historiography" on the Internet has questioned the existence of Aristotle, arguing that it is in XIII

Read on