The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Recently, the China-Europe submarine high-speed cable project "PEACE" has become the focus of the United States. Starting from Pakistan, crossing the Strait of Hormuz and the Suez Canal and finally arriving in Marseille, France, the project will be the most convenient, largest-capacity, lowest-latency optical cable project between Asia and Europe, capable of transmitting the equivalent of 90,000 hours of network TV data per second. In addition, the breakout cable will also connect Malta, Cyprus, Egypt, Djibouti, Kenya and other countries to expand the cooperation network.
Currently, there are more than 200 submarine cables around the world, responsible for 98% of network data and telephone exchanges, most of which are controlled by American companies, a key component of American Internet hegemony. China's fiber optic cable project is seen as a threat to U.S. hegemony. In 2020, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo publicly accused China of fiber-optic cable projects that could be used for intelligence gathering, drawing pressure from countries such as Germany and France.
But the leaders of France and Germany have expressed their opposition to isolating China, emphasizing cooperation with China and arguing that decoupling is not in Europe's interest. China has been expanding its infrastructure, especially internet infrastructure, and its influence over the global internet is increasing, despite some restrictions imposed by the United States.
The United States is trying to provoke contradictions between the countries of the Eurasian continent in order to maintain its hegemonic position. The United States is concerned about Russia's tensions with Europe, as well as China's economic cooperation with Europe. The United States is trying to build an anti-China consensus among European countries and spread anti-China sentiment.
The United States has questioned China's ethnic policy and tried to create anti-Chinese sentiment in European countries. However, European countries need to understand that sanctions cannot force China to submit, and that bilateral cooperation on an equal footing is the way to achieve benefits. The plan for the anti-China alliance was not solid and lacked realistic economic and political support.
The United States needs more tools in the face of China, but it is difficult for them to provide substantial economic benefits beyond advocating anti-China. Therefore, the establishment of the anti-China alliance faces great challenges in supporting practical interests. The cost of maintaining power is likely to rise, and the legitimacy of the U.S. government is being questioned.
For China, dealing with U.S. hostility requires vigilance, but it must not be allowed to interfere with foreign cooperation. The weakness and political turmoil of the U.S. government have sent shockwaves through Western democracies. In the long run, a blow to the legitimacy of the U.S. government increases the cost of maintaining the regime.
The United States needs to unite European countries, but lacks the means to provide practical benefits. European countries need to think rationally not to try to benefit from China through sanctions, but to achieve common interests through equal bilateral cooperation. The construction of the anti-China alliance has difficulties in supporting practical interests.
There is no fundamental conflict between China and European countries, so European countries should seek equal cooperation with China, and not follow the United States in anti-China. The U.S. attempt to create an anti-China alliance may lack realistic support and can only try to unite the country through ideology and racism.
U.S. sanctions and anti-China actions have no real impact on China, but may raise questions about European countries, making them understand that sanctions cannot force China to make concessions, and that benefits can only be obtained through equal bilateral cooperation. The establishment of the Anti-China League faces practical challenges and lacks substantive support.
Practical interests are key in building interstate alliances, and the U.S. anti-China alliance program lacks real economic and political support. European countries need to think rationally and not try to seek benefits from China through sanctions, but should achieve common interests through equal bilateral cooperation.
The United States needs more means to unite European countries, but beyond advocating anti-China, it is difficult for them to provide substantial economic benefits. Therefore, the anti-China alliance faces difficulties in building up practical interests and support. The cost of maintaining power is likely to rise, and the legitimacy of the U.S. government is being questioned.
Ultimately, European countries should view cooperation rationally and seek practical benefits, rather than being swayed by U.S. political motives. The U.S. anti-China alliance program may face insurmountable challenges because it lacks practical support and the potential for cooperation between China and European countries is huge.
This article discusses PEACE, a China-Europe submarine high-speed cable project led by China, and U.S. concerns about the project. The article mentions the technical characteristics of the project, the importance of the global submarine cable network, and the competition between China and the United States. Now, let's write a revelation of no less than 500 words based on these contents, and then provide a summary of no less than 800 words.
Revelation:
The content of this article highlights several important points and implications:
1 Strategic importance of submarine cables: Submarine cables are responsible for 98% of the world's network data exchange and telephone traffic, making them critical infrastructure for information transmission. China's aggressive expansion of its involvement in this area raises concerns in the United States that it could change the existing pattern of information transmission.
2 Strengthening EU-China cooperation: The project "PEACE" represents the growing relationship between China and Europe. The fact that the leaders of France and Germany have spoken out against isolating China is a sign of the strengthening of Sino-European relations. This poses a challenge to the United States in building an anti-China alliance.
3 U.S. Global Standing Takes Shock: The U.S. government's actions in recent years, including foreign policy and domestic political struggles, have raised questions about U.S. values and legitimacy at home and abroad. This could have long-term implications for America's global standing.
4 U.S. Attempts to Shape Anti-China Alliances: This article mentions U.S. attempts to create "coalitions of anti-China countries," but points out that such attempts may lack concrete practical interest support in European countries.
Summary:
The article discusses in detail the China-Europe submarine high-speed cable project PEACE and U.S. concerns about the project. From this, the following important conclusions can be drawn:
1 The importance of submarine cables: Global communication and data transmission rely on submarine cables, which makes them the key to global information interconnection. China's active involvement in this area has raised concerns among the United States that it could pose a threat to U.S. supremacy in global information transmissions.
2 Deepening of EU-China relations: The project "PEACE" marks the strengthening of EU-China relations. Countries such as France and Germany have expressed their opposition to isolating China, which shows the momentum of cooperation between China and Europe. This poses a challenge to the United States' attempt to build an anti-China alliance.
3 U.S. Global Standing: This article notes that the U.S. government's foreign policy and domestic political struggles have raised questions about U.S. values and legitimacy at home and abroad. This could have long-term implications for America's global standing and international relations.
4 U.S. Anti-China Attempts: The United States has tried to build an anti-China alliance, but the article argues that such attempts may lack concrete practical interest support. As a result, the United States faces challenges in enlisting the support of European countries.
In summary, China's submarine cable project "PEACE" represents a deepening of China-EU cooperation, and has also raised concerns in the United States. In building an anti-China alliance, the United States needs to consider practical interests and the complexity of international relations. Similarly, as China continues to expand its influence in the field of global information transmission, it needs to maintain equal and mutually beneficial cooperation with other countries. In this way, broader international peace and cooperation can be achieved.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, relevant data, theoretical research in the Internet materials, does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. We are not responsible for any issues arising above or in connection with the above and the author of this article do not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.