How JD.com and other celebrities respond to the recent rumor-mongering incident on the Internet has opened the question, which has been filled with various rumors recently, including Liu Qiangdong of JD.com, Zheng Qiang, the president of Internet celebrities, and Xiao Xinfeng, deputy mayor of Wuhan Xinzhou District. These rumors may be amplified for some subtlety, or they may be pure fiction. In this regard, affected public figures or enterprises have debunked rumors and protected their reputations.
First of all, JD.com responded to the rumor that "a businessman surnamed Liu was suspected of being arrested in violation of the law". JD.com made it clear that this was released by people with ulterior motives in order to manipulate public opinion, which is completely inconsistent with the facts. And netizens linked this matter with Jingdong's Liu Qiangdong, which really lacked basic judgment. Since the Mingzhou incident, Liu Qiangdong has been committed to the development of the company and bringing positive effects to the society.
Secondly, rumors about the Internet celebrity principal Zheng Qiang have also attracted attention on the Internet. A netizen named "Huaqi" claimed that Zheng Qiang had kept his mistress when he was the president of Guizhou University. But Zheng Qiang quickly fought back, revealing the background and purpose of the netizen. It turned out that "Huaqi" was a criminal who wanted Zheng Qiang to borrow money for him, and spread rumors because he was rejected.
In addition, Xiao Xinfeng, deputy mayor of Wuhan's Xinzhou District, was also implicated in a sexual harassment incident with another Wuhan University student named Xiao. Some netizens speculated about the relationship between the two based on the same surname of the two. But in fact, the two have nothing to do with each other. This misunderstanding caused by the same surname is quite similar to Liu Qiangdong's incident.
For these online rumors, the victim certainly has the right to refute the rumor. But more importantly, the public should also strengthen judgment and not believe some unfounded claims on the Internet. The Internet is not a place outside the law, and rumor-mongers must be held accountable for their actions.
In summary, the recent Internet rumors once again remind us that we should be more cautious about online information, not gullible and not spread. And for those who spread rumors, society and the law should give serious punishment.