The visual impact of Yang Liping's peacock dance
Recently, Yang Liping's peacock dance has become a hot topic, netizens have mixed reviews, and the derogatory component seems to be getting bigger and bigger, which is unprecedented. This attracted a lot of attention, and finally gave up the idea that the matter was not about himself, and sorted out the ins and outs of the matter. It turned out that the male dancers were bold and out of line, almost naked, which was unbearable. Many netizens questioned, is this an artistic performance or an obscene provocation?
The basis for judging the above questions obviously lies in whether the balance has been grasped. It's actually a matter of degree. Sometimes art and obscenity are separated by only a layer of paper, and when this layer of paper is broken, art deteriorates and tastes.
So, let's examine Yang Liping's peacock dance. The controversial peacock dance this time is not Yang Liping's solo dance, but a "peacock love" performed with a male dancer. The so-called "peacock love" is actually a peacock courtship carnival, and the male dancer is almost naked and clings to Yang Liping, ear sideburns, said to be in line with the image of a peacock, in order to pursue freedom and liberation. This is an explanation, but it seems far-fetched. In order to pursue freedom and liberation, the scene of peacock mating on the stage will undoubtedly be more terrifying!
This brings us to the pursuit of art. Yang Liping's early "Dance of the Sparrow" reached the peak of dance art and received countless applause and applause, but she was obviously not satisfied with her existing achievements, and she wanted to pursue the ultimate in art. However, she forgets that the pursuit of the ultimate in art sometimes inevitably leads to the opposite of art, and eventually becomes nothingness. The great French novelist Balzac fully demonstrated this artistic dichotomy in his "Incredible Masterpiece".
To some extent, this is Yang Liping's enchantment in the field of art. At this point, art is not aesthetic, but goes to vulgarity and falls into the trap set by itself. Under the banner of breaking through the shackles of traditional aesthetic standards, it is unconventional to show the muscles of male toned without knowing that it is immoral and even disgusting. This conclusion can be drawn from the common boos from netizens.
Take another look at the photos taken by netizens to feel the visual impact brought by "Peacock Love": although Yang Liping's upper body is exposed, it is still covered, the male dancer is naked on the upper body, and the lower body is only covered with a flesh-colored gauze scarf, if there is none; And Yang Liping hugged the almost naked male dancer and made intimate movements, which is called interpreting "peacock love"! It is puzzling that this play is strictly forbidden to children under 1.2 meters!
