Or withdraw from the Iranian nuclear agreement, Iran said that it is setting a maximum time limit for negotiations: the door to dialogue will not be opened forever
Recently, Iranian Foreign Minister Abdollahian said in an interview with Russian media that at present, the relevant Iranian agencies have submitted to the Iranian parliament a proposal to set a maximum period for returning to the United Nations nuclear issue plan.
Obviously, this move means that Iran has no extra patience, and waiting for the openness and concessions of some countries on the Iranian nuclear issue also shows that Iran may be considering withdrawing from the Iranian nuclear agreement.
Abdullahian said, "The proposal to set a maximum resolution period for the agreement plan is currently before Congress, and the door to dialogue will not remain open." ”
According to relevant information, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Carney previously held talks with British and French diplomatic officials in Norway to discuss specific measures to restore the Iranian nuclear agreement, and the EU also participated in the talks.
Seven years have passed since Iran and the six countries signed the JCPOA in Vienna, Austria, in 2015.
The United States, as the leader of the Iranian nuclear agreement, chose to withdraw in 2018 due to the Trump administration's willful behavior, which made it impossible to implement many measures stipulated in the agreement that allow Iran to restructure its nuclear program in the next 10 to 15 years, including restricting the development of some nuclear facilities and making its nuclear program public, and the Iranian nuclear agreement has essentially stalled.
In April 2021, negotiations to resume implementation of the JCPOA were held in Vienna, and after eight rounds of talks, some preliminary agreements were reached, although the negotiations were intermittent due to conflicts between Iran and the West.
In June last year, after the coordination of the European Union, the Biden administration re-participated in the Iranian nuclear negotiations, and the United States, Europe and Iran held talks in Doha, and basically reached further agreements on the basis of the original agreement.
According to the EU, the primary objective of this negotiation is to reach a "final version" document after the remaining contradictions have been resolved by the draft outcome of the negotiations in the past, so this can be counted as partial success.
As for the point of failure, it still lies in the current complex and changing contradictions between the United States and Iran, and the huge gap between the United States and Iran in their basic positions on the nuclear issue has led to both sides making no concessions and each holding on to their own words.
The United States has not participated in the meeting for three years, and as soon as it participated, it demanded that Iran immediately resume the implementation of all the provisions of the Iranian nuclear agreement, ignoring the various additional effects caused by the United States undermining US-Iran relations and creating regional disputes over the years, and said that only Iran fulfills all the provisions will it be willing to lift unilateral sanctions.
Iran, on the other hand, has lost all trust and dialogue expectations for the United States, requiring it to lift all sanctions in advance and promise to all parties participating in the meeting not to withdraw from the JCPOA without authorization, so that Iran can implement the terms of the agreement in accordance with the provisions of the agreement.
In addition to this basic contradiction, the United States and Iran have no consensus on many issues, such as how to monitor and confirm each other's compliance with the treaty, how to specifically plan the relevant affairs and coverage of nuclear-related institutions, and the content of sanctions lifting, and the basic contradiction cannot be resolved, resulting in the two sides always refusing to make concessions.
In addition to the contradiction of the Iranian nuclear issue itself, the ideological contradiction in diplomacy between the United States and Iran is also an important issue that obstructs the conclusion of the Iranian nuclear agreement.
For its part, the Biden administration, after last year's diplomatic failures, is eager to redesign its Middle East strategy.
Because of this, the Biden administration is not averse to peace with Iran on some issues, and is basically willing to loosen sanctions, but it does not think so about the Republican Party and Israel, which "does not share the sky" with Iran.
According to the facts, the US Republican Party regards countries such as Iran, as well as the "great power behind them", as outright enemies of US interests, and a considerable part of the US elite, including Trump's son-in-law's Kushner family, has a high hatred of Iran.
These people even influence the US political circles to regard the contradiction with Iraq as "politically correct", which has increased the divisive tendency of the US government on the Iranian nuclear issue.
Israel and Iran are "ready to let each other disappear from the earth", so far the two sides have had many "direct conflicts" in Syria, and as an important fulcrum and ally of the US Middle East strategy, Israel is not willing to let the United States loosen its ties on Iran with the solution of the Iranian nuclear issue.
Finally, while the United States is slowly retreating from the Middle East, the U.S. and Iran remain antagonistic on issues including the division of Syria, the situation in Lebanon, the GCC, and the conflict in Yemen.
These regional conflicts also play a role in the conduct of the negotiations, and the United States may demand concessions from Iran in terms of its influence expansion.
However, it is clear that the Iranian side regards these issues as core issues, so if the issues of the conflicting interests of Iran and the United States in the Middle East are not resolved, the Iranian nuclear agreement negotiations cannot be carried out.
However, although the contradiction is on both sides, the responsibility is American, and we must know that the US-Iran game process, including the Iranian nuclear negotiations, has always taken the United States' infringement of Iran's national interests and interference in its internal affairs as the starting point and an important part of the process, and the various persecutions adopted by the United States against Iran, including sanctions, are the direct reasons for Iran to give up and continue to wait.
Then, since the United States is still unwilling to make concessions and truly stand on Iran's standpoint to solve the problem, Tehran also has reason to protect its own interests.
When Iran really withdraws from the Iranian nuclear agreement, perhaps the world's "Iranian nuclear issue" will not be so harmful, but the "Iranian nuclear issue" of the United States may be more serious, so the United States had better properly handle the negotiations with Iran.
The source of the material is Qianjuntang, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete
