"Dense and harsh" is the four most commonly used words to evaluate Qin Law, so commonly used, it shows that this is basically the consensus of some expert teachers, so it is often used in relevant articles and books to spread widely and form a consensus.
Yunmeng Qin Jian, who has been learning to copy Xi, has been for more than a month, and at first he felt novel, because he didn't know anything about it, but as the study progressed, when he walked into it, he felt from curiosity to heaviness, and even depressed, remembering the phrase "power envoys, capture their people" in "Warring States Policy Zhao Ce Lu Zhonglian Yi Emperor Qin", and feel that Xi copying these contents is somewhat depressed and depressing, but I have to do it? Hi died at the age of 46, I wonder if it is related to the invisible pressure formed by his work? If this invisible pressure is enormous, the impact on health can be imagined.
Continue reading the relevant content of the Legal Q&A today.
Combined with Yunmeng Qinjian finishing group, teacher Li Xueqin and experts to share the content as follows:
Original text 1: The law is "the same law with the □", and there is (also) "the same sin", and these two things cohabit, pawn, and sit together. The cloud "sin with the same sin", and the cloud "against his sin", Fedang sits. Man enslaves the parents of his master, is he the □ master, and is not? Cohabitants are the □ masters, and different residents are not the □ owners.
To the effect that the text says "the same law as theft" and "with the same sin," and that those who cohabit, the same law, and the same army of these two types of crimes should sit together. The Vinaya says "with the same sin," but it also says "against it," and the offender shall not sit together. (The contradiction in this decree may have made Xi a little puzzled, so this is specifically recorded.) If a private slave steals the things of the master's parents, is the private slave a thief? If the master's parents live with the master, the private slave acts as the thief; Private slaves do not act as thieves.
Original 2: "Whoever □ sin and sin together, sit in the dwelling place." What is "cohabitation"? The household is "cohabitation", sitting subordinate, subordinate to the household is called □ (also).
It is to the effect that "theft and other similar crimes, cohabitation should be held together". What is "cohabitation"? Householding is "cohabitation" (how the concept of cohabitation is defined is indeed very important for specific judgments. ), but if the slave commits a crime, the master shall sit together, and the master shall sin and the slave shall not sit together. (Reasonable, like!) ）
Original 3: "□□ man, buy (sell) what he □ and buy it for his master." Today□□ armor, buy (sell), buy cloth and get it, when clothes and cloth are not appropriate? When cloth and other bought armor, the clothes are improper.
The meaning is that after the thief steals, he sells the stolen item and sells other items, and he must return it to the owner. If a thief steals A's clothes, sells the clothes, buys cloth, and is caught, should he give the clothes and cloth to A? Cloth and other purchased goods should be given to A, and clothing should not be returned. (Very specific and clear.) ）
Original text 4: "If the temple is not □, □ its equipment, and be a subordinate to Zhao Xiang." Now or benefit "□" a kidney, benefit "□] a kidney Zang [□] does not profit a money, but (what) can be discussed? The heart and kidney and other branches (limbs) of the temple are each one body, and the Zang (□) of one body does not make a profit, and it should be endured. or straight (worth) twenty dollars, and those who are not □ straight, are treated by law.
To the effect that before the end of the public sacrifice, stealing the sacrifice, even for crimes below the punishment, should be subject to subordinates. If someone steals and steals a kidney, how should the kidney be treated as a stolen property? At the time of sacrifice, the heart, kidney, and limbs of the animal shall be used as an offering, and although this offering is worth less than one dollar as a stolen goods, it should be made a subordinate if it is stolen. There are also offerings worth twenty dollars, but only part of them are stolen, not all of them, and what is stolen is not displayed as offerings, both of which are punishable by general law. (Sacrifice is a big deal, stealing sacrificial offerings is a felony, and life is servitude.) ）
Original text 5: Can (what) mean "the temple is not □"? Putting the bean trick before the ghost is not complete is "not □". Those who are not placed and not directly (placed) are not "possessed", but must have been placed as "possessed".
What is the meaning of "ancestral wei" (this character is "lamb" in the door)"? Put the bean trick Chen in front of the ghost god seat, without taking it down, that is, (this character is "lamb" in the door). It is not considered to be a tool that has not been aged and if it is not ready to be displayed, it must be aged to be counted. (Also very specific.) ）
Original text 6: Can (what) be "□ □"? The royal shrine, 貍 (薶), is called "□".
What is the meaning of stealing sacrifices (this character is Guangnai plus "gui")? The royal family sacrifices, buried their sacrifices, are called (this character is Guangnai plus "Kei"). (This article is equivalent to a noun explanation.) ）
Original text 7: Shi Wu (Wu) A sheep, the neck of the sheep has a rope, the cord is straight (worth) a coin, ask (what) theory? A means that the sheep □ (also), and the sheep are supplied, and A leads the sheep, and it is not for the sheep.
To the effect that Shiwujia steals a sheep, there is a rope on the sheep's head, and the rope is worth a penny, how should it be treated? A wants to steal the sheep, and the rope is tied to the sheep, and A takes the sheep away, and should not be considered guilty of stealing the sheep. (Specific to the rope of the sheep, because a penny is an important criterion.) ）
(Picture from the Internet)
#Chinese Agricultural History# #Qin Agricultural History# #云梦秦简 #
