Wen 丨 Cao Jingming
Title 丨 Professor Huang Youguang: Use "polygamy" to solve the single stick problem, live-action version of "A Good Drama"
Welcome to comment on professor Huang Youguang's views!
I don't know if you have seen the movie "A Good Drama" directed by Huang Bo? Presumably the content is a group of people reduced to a desert island to be rescued, in the process of many funny and absurd plots, including a "scholar" considering that it is possible to stay on the desert island for a long time in the future, for the continuation of the race, he proposed that different men and women should have a relationship as planned, give birth to children of different genders, and then reproduce, so as to ensure that the race can continue without close relatives.
As a result, some people at the scene said: Then our group of people have become hybrid rice!
In fact, in real life, there are also experts who put forward such "insights", such as the protagonist of this article, Professor Huang Youguang: born in Malaysia, graduated from the University of Sydney, joined the Australian nationality, and was elected as an academician of the Australian Academy of Social Sciences.
Before studying Professor Huang Youguang's strange remarks, let's take a look at the academic achievements of this expert professor and see whether it is a notorious academic or a cow, ghost, and snake god with real skills.
It has been revealed that Professor Huang Youguang is the most published and cited Chinese economist in the world's top economic journal (Top 10). Although this revelation is not known to be true or false, Professor Huang Youguang is definitely one of the most well-known Chinese economists in the world, and he was widely praised before the turnaround, and his main research areas include not only China's economic issues, welfare economics and public policy.
So the question is, what "sensational" views have Professor Huang Youguang put forward? As early as a few years ago, when the population problem was just put on the surface, Professor Huang Youguang said in a proposal:
The ratio of men to women in China is seriously imbalanced, with about 117 men for every 100 women. There will be tens of millions of marriageable men who will not find a wife... Consideration should probably be given to allowing polygamous marriages.
In Professor Huang Youguang's view, the core issue is to speak together according to data and use humans as tools, which is the greatest contempt for human nature and is extremely undesirable. How much pain and suffering have human beings experienced from the development of Ru Mao drinking blood to today's civilized society? Academician Huang Youguang simply went back to the pre-liberation period, which is really ridiculous.
The simplest transposition thinking, if Professor Huang Youguang's wife found him more than a dozen good brothers, Professor Huang Youguang is smiling and accepting? Or crying and refusing? I believe the answer is self-evident! Historical experience proves that neither polyandry nor polygamy is suitable for the development of modern civilization. If you really want to solve this problem, or the focus of marriage, the author thinks that Professor Li Yinhe's "disintegration" theory will be more valuable, at least not so abrupt, under the ideal social model, single men and women listen to the guidance of the heart to choose a lover.
Returning to this point of view, the author personally strongly disagrees. How to say it? It is completely a chicken rib act that cures the symptoms but not the root cause, and is worthless. Now that the number of boys is indeed more than that of girls, it is proposed that "polygamy" solve the problem of single sticks, so what should be done after the number of girls is more than that of men? Is it necessary to restore the "polygamous" marriage relationship in the feudal society period? This is an important system related to people's livelihood, how can it be changed overnight?
Moreover, as far as the gender difference is concerned, in fact, our country is not so outrageous, unless it is a unified allocation of the whole country, when pregnant women are pregnant, they will first assign gender indicators to ensure a hundred percent balance, otherwise where is it possible to completely balance? Taking ten thousand steps back, even if the gender is really completely balanced, can it really eliminate the problem of leftover men and women? Some experienced and unscrupulous men and women are eager to step on eight boats, and it is impossible to choose one person to grow old, unless it is the state that assigns the object, so where does love come?
In order to solve the problem of single sticks, the first thing that needs to be reached is not to completely talk about data, even if there are more women and fewer men now, there will still be many older leftover women, which is not inferior to the single stick problem. To be precise, it should be said that it is distributed in two extremes, one is mainly concentrated in the mainstream cities in the first line, and the other is the real situation in the countryside.
The author of the big city has also lived, studied for four years, the problem of the older leftover women is also very serious, some are busy for the cause, the result is to delay personal problems, become the female boss in the workplace; some for the future life, pick and choose, always think that you can ride a donkey to find a horse, the result is that now even the donkey is not wanted...
The current situation in the countryside is more familiar, itself is from the countryside, just take the author's village as an example, basically there are no young people, casually read a few years of books have run to the big city, most of the rest are more than thirty single sticks, not to mention looking for a partner, even a woman can not look. In such a living environment, it is difficult for a smart woman to cook without rice, and how to solve the problem of single sticks?
This article may be simpler in content, mainly because the previously written views are not approved and cannot be published, as long as another article is reorganized and refined according to the existing information. In fact, in terms of core content, there is not much difference, it is because I saw Professor Huang Youguang's fans, consuming peerless national soldiers, saying that they were as great as it, and they would write this article indignantly. After all, not all hot spots can be rubbed, and there must be the most basic bottom line for people to do things, and public morality must not be violated, otherwise there is no difference between them and "the next three abuses".
At the end of the article, I still sincerely wish that in today's academic and scientific research environment, there can be more peerless national soldiers who are similar to the country and the people, less cattle, ghosts, and snake gods who abuse the number and sensationalize the public, especially the experts who have been there, and stay in their hometowns without any problems? It is better to be a demon than anything else, and if you really can't help it, you should first take a knife and walk around yourself.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="28" > author self-nominated</h1>
1) Wang Shuo on Chinese directors: Zhang Yimou should have been killed long ago, that is, he was engaged in decoration! Does it really make sense?
2) Wang Shuo on Chinese comedy: they are all making fun of the "poor" and have the ability to ridicule the powerful
3) Wang Shuo on Chinese directors: Feng Xiaogang deceives and flatters, is good at using others, and does not look at it no matter how good he shoots
4) Wang Shuo talked about few qualified Chinese writers: Jia Pingwa's "Waste Capital" is a toilet, Jin Yong plagiarized
5) Wang Shuo on Chinese masters: Qi Baishi is an old hooligan, 93 years old to marry a 22-year-old female nurse, really good
This article is [Cao Jingming] original, picture source network! #Brick Home#Get