After just experiencing the "plagiarism" storm, "Glory of the King" can still frequently appear on the hot search with its hero's new skin, which has to make people think. If another small manufacturer of games with no reputation has copied the things of the game manufacturer NetEase, will it be as safe as it is now, and the heat will still be there? If it is a small and medium-sized manufacturer game that is not very famous, will it have the ability to make the national big IP game "Glory of the King" stink on the hot search?
To friends who have not yet eaten this melon first make up the content, on the 21st of last week, NetEase's mobile game "Painter in Time and Space" official blog publicly published an article, boldly shouting @ king glory: "Treasure, last time your new product used other people's materials, you said it was a supplier's problem, this time is also it? Make so much money to ask for an original designer, I look at it painfully! In the Weibo, it was also accompanied by a comparison of the material of the two games to accuse "Glory of the King" of plagiarism.
As soon as this Weibo was released, it triggered a high degree of discussion, and the glory of the king and the painter traveler both appeared on weibo's hot search. Shortly after the fermentation of the incident, the "Glory of the King" supplier full-speed network issued a notice saying that it would "make a complete explanation as soon as possible" and said in the investigation statement released the next day that "there is no act of plagiarizing third-party materials".
In your opinion, is Glory of Kings plagiarized?
As a person who no longer plays these two games now, I see that no matter whether the specific elements are copied or not, they are designed according to the style of others, and they are equipped with the same background, what is there to be hard? It's like a skinning game saying, "I'm the original character."
Of course, there are also different views on this matter on the Internet. One side believes that "Glory of the King" has indeed copied the material, but it has taken the agent out to "back the pot", and the other side believes that If the evidence is conclusive, NetEase can go to court, and there is no need to touch the porcelain on Weibo.
Tencent and NetEase, both sides are game manufacturers, and their respective punches are not afraid. One through its mobile game official micro-accusation of plagiarism, one through the supplier's announcement response, the subordinate "little brother" on the stage tearing, behind which reflects the netease and Tencent two domestic game manufacturers in the game market game competition.
This time the plagiarism hot search brought a cumulative retweet of 10w+, a comment number of 9.9w+, and a high of 84w likes. Seeing this, I can't help but say: "It's really worthy of NetEase." In fact, this is not the first time that NetEase has shook the king's plagiarism behavior, when the "Decisive Battle of Ping An Kyo" posted the article "Galo Action Plagiarism Decisive Battle Ping An Jing White Wolf Action", it was also "magic imitation" by Tencent.
Moving forward, last October, the IP-derived game "Codename-Zero Three" of "Glory of Kings" fell into the poster plagiarism controversy. After the suspense poster was exposed, some netizens found that the scenery after the door was opened in the poster was suspected of taking the picture of "Star Falling Lake" in Miha's "Original God". In June, some users also reported that the "Yao-Meet the Sacred Deer" skin exclusive personality action "Deer Spirit Dance" of "Glory of the King" copied the "Goldfish Ji" dance of the NetEase mobile game "Yin and Yang Division".
Similar things are not uncommon among kings, although the follow-up is either "outsourced team" or "borrowing" to explain the past, but it has hurt the hearts of many players. As one of the largest game manufacturers in China, as one of the hottest game IPs in China, even the leader cannot lead by example and correct the atmosphere of the game industry, so what will happen to other game manufacturers?
Plagiarism or borrowing, but it is a momentary heat. The game market in 2022 has long been exhausted, and what can really retain players is the need for excellent product quality. Otherwise, even if it is a big game manufacturer and the top brand in the industry, it can only be an "imitation factory".