In the current calligraphy exhibition, typos in the entries are not uncommon and criticized. So did the ancients not make mistakes? In fact, no, people are not sages, and no one can be blameless. The ancients also made mistakes, as exemplified by the typos in the tablets.
Han Li "Zhang Qianbei"
▼
In the Zhang Qianbei, "Both And Yu Jun, Cover his qi. Gu Yanwu's "Records of the Golden Stone Text": "And if there is a cloud 'both and Yu Jun', then 'cum' is a mistake." Wang Niansun's "Han Li Shi Zhi": "'Both the king and the king' are not understandable, and it is clear that it is the mistake of '爰暨于君'." "Wei Yuan Pi Stele": '爰暨于君', that is, its obvious evidence. It is said that the original text "both" and " should be used as the word "c", and the stele mistakenly separated a word up and down into two words, so as to become "both and".
The research of the two scholars is overwhelming.
Jin Wang Xizhi's "Orchid Pavilion Preface"
▼
Wang Xizhi said in the "Orchid Pavilion Preface" that "I am quick to be self-sufficient, and I don't know that old age is coming." The word "fast" is written as "怏". "怏然" was first derived from the "Warring States Policy, Qin Wei Zhao Zhi Handan": "Xin Yuanyan was displeased". Obviously, it also has the meaning of dissatisfaction and disbelief. Used in the "Orchid Pavilion Preface", the context is not appropriate and seems inexplicable. Later arguments generally considered it to be a typo.
Tang Kaishu "Jiucheng Palace"
▼
This page of Mr. Qigong's book points out that when Ouyang Quan copied the "Emperor Fu's Birthday Monument" in that year, he mistakenly wrote "Qin" as "Tai", reflecting Mr. Qigong's erudition and the in-depth and serious spirit of reading and pro-posting. According to historical records, during the Warring States period, King Qin Zhao was once called the Western Emperor, and the King of Qi Min was once called the Eastern Emperor, and the two countries were both rich and strong and stood side by side, and later called the State of Qi or Qi as "Eastern Qin", of course, it would not be "Eastern Tai". "Qin" and "Tai" are similar in shape, and when Ou Gong copied it, it may be that the original manuscript is sloppy and difficult to identify, or it may be momentarily distracted and mistaken for "Qin" for "Tai". Therefore, the stone erection of the monument, a mistake for a thousand years.
Tang Xingkai's "Literary Endowment"
▼
Lu Kam's "WenFu" has many hard wounds: "Things show the philosophy and the teeth advance", the word "tooth" should be the word "mutual", and this sentence in the "Selected Texts of Zhao Ming" is "mutual". If the word "tooth" is written as a colloquial word for "reciprocity", then a stroke must be written as a bunch. "So the words of Fu Yue", Fu Yue, "Zhao Ming Wen Anthology" as "Yi Yue", "Fu" is the "Yi" of the falsehood.
Lu Kam Zhi copied this "Literary Endowment", and his attitude seemed to be a bit... Well, not rigorous enough.
Tang Kaishu "Ni Kuanzan"
▼
In Chu Suiliang's "Ni Kuanzan", "Tian" under "Fen" is written as "Mortar"; "Old" under "Day" becomes "Tian".
"Ink Edge" commented: "What should be written is not written, but what should not be written is written." How to say it well? ”
Tang Kaishu "Yin Rune Sutra"
▼
Chu Suiliang's Yin Rune Sutra is a classic of the Book of Letters. The strokes are extremely flexible, the dot paintings and turns have the meaning of the line book, and some of the heavy strokes also have the meaning of the book, and the combination of light and heavy and virtual reality is very good. The gestures are clear and natural. However, there are also some typos.
The word "cling" is a little more. The word "private" became "厶".
The word "瞽" becomes "幸" in the upper left. The right part of the word "therefore" became "long". The word "kill" has an extra "×" word.
In view of the errors in the famous posts, Shusi's suggestion is that you can 'copy' when you are studying, but do not make mistakes when creating.
Song Xingshu "New Year Exhibition Celebration Post"
▼
The "likeness" in Su Shi's "New Year Exhibition Celebration Post" "Try to make a look like this" is unknown.
The great writer also made mistakes, "like 'like' and like 'park', in fact, it is not like it." fabricate.
Song Sushi "Chibi Fu"
▼
The "Ling" of Su Shi's book "Ling Wanqing's Dazedness" is written as "Ling"; the characters with "癶" are mostly written as the upper part of the "sacrifice", such as "Deng" in "Chibi Fu", "燈" in "Xilou Su Ti" and so on.
Song SuShi xing book "West Building Su Ti"
▼
The left part of the word "Ao" should be the upper "soil" and the lower "square", and Su Shi's work is written with an extra horizontal. And all the words with "Ao", such as "boiling, clawing" in "Dongting Spring Color, Zhongshan Pine Mash Fu", and "遨" in "Chibi Fu", are written one more horizontally.
Su Shi went wrong again.
Song Cursive "Theravada Theosophy"
▼
Huang Tingjian's cursive classic "Theravada Thesis", there is a paragraph with many errors, and one after another is marked with ink dots. Is this a lack of heart?
According to the standards of today's exhibitions, it is necessary to stand on the side.
Song Xingshu "Leap Moon Thesis"
▼
In the second column of the Leap Moon Thesis, the first character "孰" and "pill" are a little more in the section. In addition to a little, the famous artists are also too much. Posterity can not be careless.
In summary, the ancients also made mistakes in writing, but mistakes are mistakes, do not give the predecessors a "false" explanation, and future generations should not use the ancients as an excuse to excuse themselves or seek comfort. If there is a mistake, it must be corrected.