In the impression of many people, a game flow income is too low, the operation can not continue, most of them will choose to close the server to stop operating, before the game to charge money players can only think of themselves unlucky, change the mobile game so, and even many well-known games of large manufacturers are the same.
However, the recent suspension of tencent mobile game "Cloud Dress Feather" has made players feel that they have finally won back a city in the contradiction with manufacturers. Because the matter once became a hot search on Weibo, which attracted the attention of the China Consumer Association, perhaps under the pressure of public opinion, the official of "Yunbei Haori" subsequently suspended the suspension process and announced that it would continue to provide game services. After that, the China Consumer Association also launched a questionnaire survey on Weibo on "online game suspension issues".
Many of them are like "Who Owns Virtual Property?" "Do I need compensation for stopping?" What is the form of compensation? "Does the White Prostitutes need to be compensated?" This is a very real and direct problem. Therefore, some netizens speculated that this was an opportunity to conduct a survey to promote the improvement of relevant laws to protect the rights and interests of players as consumers.
In the final analysis, manufacturers can stop serving at will, that is, they think that the player's account and virtual property such as equipment props in the game belong to themselves, and the player only has the right to use, since it is their own thing, they can dispose of it as much as they want. Before Tencent and the third-party trading platform lawsuit lawyer's classic line "the operator never considers the player's feelings" Everyone still remembers it.
In order to appease these players, some innocuous compensation will be introduced, such as converting the previous recharge into gift packages and discounts for other games. But the players who stayed behind, ben is because they like this game will still insist on playing when facing the shutdown, you let him spend time, energy, money to get the game content, directly change the form of another game he does not like at all, the player will certainly not appreciate.
In reality, players have been very tolerant, considering that the game continues to operate will indeed bring a burden to the manufacturer, so some players suggest that the manufacturer can change the game to a stand-alone version before stopping the service, and everyone takes what they need. Or to give active players a refund of the unpaid part of the recharge, but you know, the latter is very difficult. Therefore, "Cloud Dress Feather" can successfully suspend the shutdown, and this result is regarded by many netizens as a victory for players.
But did the player really win? It's hard to say yet. If the questionnaire of the China Consumer Association this time is simply to do a social survey, or as the official "YunBei Haori" officially said, it is only "suspended" the service process, rather than "terminated", in case the heat continues to close the service in the past, it is not impossible.
At such a time, similar to "Ubisoft announced that "Ghost Recon: Breakpoint" will stop developing and updating, but will continue to maintain the server" "because Mihayou changed the "Original God" character mechanism, Japanese players are ready to sue for infringement of consumer rights and interests" News, will always stimulate the nerves of domestic players, why can foreign manufacturers respect the rights and interests of players? Foreign players can vigorously defend their rights and interests, it is difficult for us to even say that there is no drama at all?
It can only be said that it is still too difficult, and it is still far from a real victory.
I am a game fungus, like ACG related information, eat melon spit, just point a concern ~ thanks