Since the official release of the Redmi K50 series, the controversy in the market seems to be very small, most of them are praising its excellent price, and think that the cost performance of 2399 yuan and 2999 yuan is very attractive.
I believe that many consumers are ready to start, but there are also many users who are more entangled and do not know how to choose between The Redmi K50 and the Redmi K50 Pro.
Because the two mobile phone products have a lot of similarities, and the balance is very strong, so when the gap is 600 yuan, the time to consider will become very long.
So today we will compare the two mobile phone products to see how users should choose.
Design and screen:
In terms of appearance, it is similar to last year's Redmi K40 series, without a particularly large range of adjustments, if you do not look carefully, it is really difficult to see which of the two models is the Pro version and which is the standard version.
The screen is Samsung's 6.67-inch AMOLED screen, flexible straight screen, center single-cut design, resolution of 3200×1440, reaching the 2K level.
Moreover, both mobile phone products support 120Hz refresh rate, support 16,000 levels of automatic brightness, support ambient color temperature sensing, support Dolby Vision, support HDR10+, and support P3 color gamut.
Although we all know that 2K resolution is going to be sent to the mid-range mobile phone market, I just didn't expect it to be so exaggerated.
Differences in core configuration:
Redmi K50 Pro is equipped with a Tianji 9000 processor, due to the early release, the performance is basically very clear, using TSMC 4nm process, the current Snapdragon 8 Gen1 is the most direct competitor.
The Redmi K50 standard version uses the Tianji 8100 processor, TSMC 5nm OEM, compared with the Tianji 8000 core frequency increased to 2.85GHz, that is, four 2.85GHz Cortex-A78 large core and four 2.0GHz A55 energy efficiency core.
Then, with the full-blooded LPDDR5 and the full-bloodED USF3.1, there will be no stress whether it's the running of mainstream games or daily use.
What's more, the processors equipped with the two mobile phone products are TSMC's process, so the daily performance naturally goes without saying.
Differences in taking photos:
The Redmi K50 Standard Edition uses a 48MP OIS main camera + 8MP ultra-wide angle + 2MP macro lens, while the front lens is 20 MEGApixel.
However, the Redmi K50 Pro is different, equipped with a 108MP pixel OIS main camera + 8 million pixel ultra-wide angle + 2 million pixel macro lens.
In addition to the 100 million pixel difference, the position of the body lens is also marked with a 108MP design, and both mobile phone products bring OIS stabilization technology.
Although there are a few shots, this year's Redmi K50 series has indeed improved a lot, and the actual effect should be amazing.
Differences in battery life:
Redmi K50 built-in 5500mAh, support 67W fast charging, the official said that 48 minutes can be charged to 100%, although there is no use of 120W fast charging, but this battery capacity is also very exaggerated.
Redmi K50 Pro built-in is 5000mAh, although not as good as Redmi K50, but the use of a single battery, fast charge increased to 120W, 19 minutes can be fully charged, and the machine is also equipped with a surging P1 charging chip.
It is not difficult to see that in terms of endurance, the difference between the two models is very large, and it also gives users a choice, that is, more durable endurance or more powerful fast charging.
As for the function, there is no difference, the weight and thickness of the two mobile phones are also the same, weighing 201g, the thickness is 8.48mm, and the mobile phone material is a double-sided glass body, and the color matching is ink feather, silver trace, illusion, and glow.
It is also equipped with Dolby Atmos stereo dual speakers, X-axis linear motors, multi-function NFC and IR remote controls, as well as the latest MIUI13.
Just look at these parameters, it can be clearly seen that the Redmi mobile phone has really done the balance and cost performance this time.
Write at the end
Judging from the above comparison, the gap between the two products is mainly concentrated in the three aspects of performance, photography and battery life, and the parameters of the rest are almost the same. So, how do you make your choices? Welcome to leave a message, like, share.