Since the mainland shifted more attention from "Made in China" and "Chinese infrastructure" to "Chinese technology", Lao Mei's targeting of the mainland's high-end industries has not stopped for a moment. This time, when everyone thought that Lao Mei was focusing on the matter of cutting off the supply of Big Mao, Lao Mei began to use this to suppress some high-end enterprises in the mainland, such as DJI, in the open and covert. But DJI is not a soft persimmon, and you can pinch it if you want to.
Lao Mei named, these companies have not escaped
Entering March, the "supply cut" reached a peak period, and the rational and restrained approach of mainland enterprises allowed Lao Mei to find a new reason and began to name some mainland enterprises, claiming that "the industries of Xiaomi, Lenovo, SMIC and other enterprises have been applied to the technology of AMD, Qualcomm and other enterprises." "Take people softly, eat people's mouths short", this time, no doubt, is to warn these enterprises: this core technology, I hold you for a lifetime, it is best to obey a little.
In order to prove that she was not joking, Lao Mei also turned over the old account and asked ZTE to go to the United States for court. If you don't listen to me, ZTE is just the first one. ZTE has now said that the personnel involved have long left their jobs, ZTE has no obligation to respond to the lawsuit, and the company's business is not affected. In the face of Lao Mei's unreasonable teasing, ZTE did not protest too much, but only appeased shareholders and continued to act in a low profile.
Relatively speaking, Huawei is more free. Although Huawei's market share continued to decline under the beating of chip sticks and 5G sticks, it did not hurt the foundation. It can also maintain a high investment in research and development and create a more united corporate atmosphere. Although it is not possible to overtake in curves immediately, it is more than enough not to be named, or to ignore the roll call, in this context of right and wrong.
Drunkenness means DJI
On March 12, the previous online rumor that "Figma" cut off DJI's supply was verified by @ Real-time Design JsDesign, and the vector graphics editing software Figma complied with Laomei's instructions and chose the terminal to cooperate with DJI. According to the internal letter, this is because DJI was officially named by Lao Mei, so Figma can only choose to suspend the provision of services. According to the news circulating on the Internet, Lao Mei's operation also caught DJI off guard, how long has it been, and it has come again?
To tell the truth, DJI can really be said to have suffered from the disaster of innocence, just because it did not cut off the supply to Da Mao, it was necessary to accept the supply cut, is this not a proper bandit mentality? As a global high-end enterprise, when did DJI's right to make its own choices be deprived? In fact, Lao Mei herself is not meant to be drunk, not in Da Mao, but in Dajiang. DJI occupies nearly 80% of Laomei's market all year round, and for a company that takes money in its own home all day, Laomei has long been unhappy. In the past few years, Lao Mei has been trying to suppress DJI, but with little effect. This time to catch up with the limelight, Lao Mei once again changed her tactics, and was bound to hit DJI by surprise.
DJI: Here you come
Lao Mei has shown her bayonet, how should DJI defend? Don't worry, DJI is not a soft persimmon, pinch it if you want. If you want DJI to fall, you must first ask 80% of the drone consumers in LaoMei. A product that even the old US military side lamented "really fragrant", if it is so unbeaten, is it not punching yourself in the face?
According to the data, the global civilian drone market, DJI accounted for about 80%. No matter how developed the country, the drone has to fall under the "pomegranate skirt" of DJI. Not only that, although DJI has been positioning its products as "civilian consumer drones", but DJI's performance is too strong, military UAVs can not fight, so DJI has to watch countries around the world buy DJI UAVs back to the military. More importantly, DJI UAV, like Huawei, insists on technological autonomy, and its products have many independent core technologies, not only can not card the neck, but also stuck the neck of others. In the face of Lao Mei's repeated difficulties, DJI used this to resolve them one by one, saying: You come here.
At the beginning, Lao Mei wanted to suppress DJI, and by the way, he supported his own drone, listed various "crimes" for DJI, and then put DJI on the "blacklist". However, this move was protested by the old US military, because after the absence of DJI, they used their own UAV, not to mention expensive, and the performance was not a little bit worse. However, Lao Mei has already "convicted" DJI, and is it not a slap in the face to continue to use it? In the end, the two rights harmed each other lesser, and Lao Mei could only ban it on the surface, but actually opened up the sales channels, and called it a delay.
Last year, two of DJI's products were successfully brought to justice and passed the review of Lao Mei. This made him even more anxious, so if he went on, would he still be able to see the day when DJI fell? This time, Lao Mei once again stared at DJI, that is, with the intention of trying again, even if it could not be knocked down, it would be disgusting to DJI. So what happened to DJI after it lost Figma's services? The impact will be a little, but not much. Because there are already similar enterprises in China to provide corresponding services, such as Blue Lake, Muke and other domestic brands.
On the evening of March 12, the Blue Lagoon Collaboration Platform said that its MasterGo is ready to import Figmo files at any time and improve support for subsequent editing functions. The meaning is already obvious: DJI don't be afraid, use me. It is believed that in the future, DJI will reach a new cooperation with domestic brands, and its operation will not be greatly affected. For us ordinary consumers, we are more willing to see the situation of domestic cooperation. Therefore, when Lao Mei suppresses DJI, we can assume that it is unreasonable and useless. (Bluegrass)
Ostensibly threatening Xiaomi Lenovo, but actually taking a shot at DJI? Domestic manufacturers: support DJI at any time
Drunkard does not mean wine, in DJI? DJI: Here you come