In 2019, the United States suddenly put Huawei on the so-called entity list, pointed out that there are security problems with Huawei's network equipment, and launched a series of sanctions against Huawei on this ground.
Three years have passed since the incident, but earlier this year, Britain's former commerce secretary publicly said that Britain's rejection of Huawei was not because of so-called security concerns, but because of pressure from the United States.
This is a powerful response to the RUMORS in the United States, and it also proves Huawei's innocence, but now, new problems have emerged.
The European spokesperson terminated the contract with Huawei
Commercial companies will find spokespersons for their products, after all, they all have to advertise, in Europe, Huawei just signed a three-year endorsement agreement with European star Levan in January this year.
It is reported that Levan is a two-time footballer, currently playing for Bayern Munich in Germany, the Polish national team captain, but recently unilaterally proposed to terminate the contract with Huawei, to know that the endorsement agreement has just been signed for two months.
Due to Levan's unilateral termination, a termination fee of 5 million euros will be paid, but this is not the key to the event, the key is Levan's reason for termination.
The reason for the termination was reported by the British newspaper Daily Mail, where Huawei equipment helped Russia protect its Internet from attacks from Western hackers.
Foreign media: This reason puts the United States in the "pit"
I have to say that such a reason is simply ridiculous to the extreme, but some foreign media even said that this reason for termination is undoubtedly to directly "pit" the United States.
As we mentioned above, when the United States wielded the stick of sanctions and wanted to suppress Huawei in various ways, the reason given was that There were security problems with Huawei's equipment.
And all along, the reason for the US suppression has been used as an excuse, although the US side has not come up with any evidence.
At that time, in order to prove its innocence, Huawei also invited relevant customers to test and verify Huawei's equipment, and did not find the so-called security problems.
But now, the reason for Levan's termination of the contract is that Huawei's equipment security performance is too good, and their Western hackers can't crack it.
Not only that, we consider from another aspect, the British Daily Mail pointed out that Huawei's equipment protects the Russian Internet, so why did not explain what the equipment of Ericsson and Nokia is?
So can we understand that Ericsson and Nokia's devices are not protected to the Russian Internet? So whose network devices have security issues?
Analysis here, we go one step further, the United States before suppressing Huawei, was exposed to the monitoring scandal, and if according to the current situation, is it not to show that Huawei's network equipment security performance is too good, if everyone uses Huawei equipment, the United States can not implement monitoring, and with Nokia, Ericsson equipment, the United States is not worried?
summary
In short, we see that the termination of Levan's contract with Huawei once again shows the double standards of Western society, standing in Huawei's position, the security performance of its own equipment is not good, and the security performance is not right.
This reminds us of what Hua Chunying said: Huawei's biggest "fault" is that it is a Chinese company.
What do you think about that?