2022-03-05 06:30
Source: WeChat public account Huang Yinbing
To be honest, genes are a tall thing, because ordinary people don't understand, only people who understand flicker. But since the outbreak of the new crown epidemic, what major contributions has Li Hui, as a top expert in genetic technology, made in the genetic research of the new crown virus? No; in the decades that Li Hui has focused on genetic research, has Li Hui independently discovered new human races? No. Before the discovery of Denisovans in the West, Li Hui did not know about the existence of Denisovan genes. What role genes have in studying the origin of mankind and what significance it has for the current fight against the epidemic, I am afraid that Li Hui himself cannot say. Li Hui's genetic theory has no other purpose than to prove the African theory.
To explain, I have recently been talking about the origin of mankind in the form of an essay. Be casual and say whatever you want. For arguments, I'll have to look at my previous articles.
Today I will talk about genetic mutations and the causes of genetic mutations. This topic arose after Li Hui's interview record.
In "Did Chinese Ancestors Really Come from Africa," Li Hui said that "the first result of genetic research is the deciphering of the genome of modern humans," "the genetic distance between humans and people is absolutely no more than 200,000 years," and "those who have differences in 200,000 years are all concentrated in Africa." However, I think africans have two sources, a small number of apes who survived the quaternary first ice age, and an ancient ape-type Homo sapiens who migrated from East Asia after the first ice age. East Asian ape-type Homo sapiens entered Africa between 900,000 and 750,000 years ago. Because this time period is the first interglacial period of the Quaternary. So the genetic distance between the African primitive type and the race outside Africa is at least 800,000 years. Entering Africa, evolution has stalled! That's why I say that Africa (strictly speaking sub-Saharan Africa) is the dead ground of human evolution.
In addition to the research results of genes, Li Hui also talked about fossils. He said that "the fossils of ancient humans found everywhere are not the ancestors of modern humans everywhere, but the ancient humans who came out of Africa twice before, and they were replaced by modern humans on the road of evolution, leaving no direct descendants."
Is there any genetic evidence for ancient humans for this view? This should be analyzed. Li Hui said that the first important result of genetic research was "deciphering the genome of modern humans" and did not claim to decipher the genes of ancient humans. The genetic material of ancient humans should be absent, that is, there is, and it should also be the result of inversion. Backwards is unreliable.
Then read "Chinese ancestors, did they really come from Africa? "The first time a Terran animal left Africa was about 1.75 million years ago. About 2.6 million years ago, the African race appeared in the Homo sapiens, and about 1.9 million years ago, the subspecies of Homo erectus were divided. About 1.75 million years ago, some craftsmen went out of Africa and entered East Asia from West Asia, covering most of Eurasia and becoming the ancestors of various subspecies of Homo erectus in East Asia."
"1 million years ago, early Homo sapiens mutated among the craftsmen who remained in Africa. Early Homo sapiens left Africa about 800,000 years ago, and it took about 300,000 years to cover the territory originally occupied by Homo erectus and cause it to nearly become extinct. By 700,000 years ago, the world began to enter the ice age, sub-Saharan Africa, eurasia west and east, geographically isolated, homo sapiens in the three places gradually divided into three subspecies of Rhodesians in Africa, Neanderthals in Europe, and Denisovans in Asia. ”
"200,000 years ago, the Rhodesians of Africa mutated again and evolved to produce modern humans. Modern humans spent more than 100,000 years covering most of the African continent until the 74,000-year-old Baba catastrophe provided an opportunity to get out of Africa. ”
"The cause of modern man's departure from Africa has been quite clear in academic research, about 74,000 years ago, the Indonesian island of Sumatra Dopa volcanic eruption, its equivalent of nearly 1,000 Mount Vesuvius erupted, bringing great disasters to global organisms, Eurasian Homo sapiens (that is, Neanderthals and Denisovans) are also on the verge of extinction, which cleared the way for modern people to go out of Africa."
The above is the "African origin theory" described by Li Hui, that is, the "out of Africa theory.".
To praise Li Hui's academic progress here, it is no longer to refer to the group that came out of Africa as "Homo sapiens", and to include Neanderthals and Denisovans in Eurasia as "Homo sapiens". It seems that my article about Homo sapiens, Li Hui understood.
Neanderthals were early European Homo sapiens, a name familiar to everyone. Denisovans are an early subspecies of Homo sapiens found in denisova caves in the Altai Mountains, Denisovans have become a new race from the day of their discovery, and have gradually been made into a general term for early Asian new Homo sapiens, and have achieved the same treatment as Neanderthals, that is, Neanderthals are early European Homo sapiens, Denisovans are early Asian Homo sapiens. During this period, China discovered the Fuyan Cave People, Xuchang People, and Dragon People, all of which were not treated as Homo sapiens subspecies by the international academic community. Li Hui said: "How to define Homo sapiens in early China is controversial even among many archaeologists. But from the perspective of the entire large ecology and evolution, these early Homo sapiens in East China should belong to the subspecies of Denisovans, which are genetically identified. ”。 Of course, this definition is not made by Li Hui, but by foreigners. Denisovans are also not Li Hui's research on genetic development. When I introduce this situation, I am further unraveling the veil that Li Hui theoretically has. Li Hui's theory is that of foreigners. In fact, the Denisovans are the Dragons.
The "African Origin Theory" narrated by Li Hui is three times out of Africa from humanoid animals, early Homo sapiens, and modern humans. Modern Homo sapiens out of Africa this time will not talk about.
Li Hui gave the time when Homo erectus came out of Africa about 1.75 million years ago. About 1.75 million years ago, there were already many Homo erectus people in East Asia, such as the Jianshi people, the Wushan people, the Anhui Fanchang zigzag cave people, the Shangchen people, the Xihoudu people, and the Nihewan people, all of which were more than 2 million years old.
Could Homo erectus, who left Africa 1.75 million years ago, "enter East Asia from West Asia, cover most of Eurasia, and become the ancestors of various Homo erectus subspecies in East Asia", as Li Hui said? This requires evidence of ancient human genes from 1.75 million years ago in Eurasia and ancient human genes from Africa, and then comparative studies with ancient human genes in Eurasia 1.75 million years later to confirm, otherwise it cannot be confirmed. Li Hui certainly could not come up with genetic evidence of ancient humans.
Therefore, Li Hui's so-called Homo erectus who came out of Africa 1.75 million years ago "entered East Asia from West Asia, covered most of Eurasia, and became the ancestor of various homo erectus subspecies in East Asia" is only Li Hui's imagination without ancient human genetic evidence.
Study paleoclimate, 18 million years ago, the earth opened a cooling mode, gradually formed a dry and cold climate, the cooling mode continued until the first ice age of the Quaternary, the time of the first ice age of the Quaternary is between 1.2 million and 900,000 years ago, in this dry and cold climate mode, the thermophilic animals are migrating southward, the Homo erectus in Africa should have stayed in Africa 1.75 million years ago, out of Africa is to find death.
The Hassara Desert was formed 2.5 million years ago, and the North-South Passage of the Nile may have always existed, but it is unknown whether Homo erectus africa could cross it 1.75 million years ago to reach Western Asia.
So it was impossible for Homo erectus to come out of Africa 1.75 million years ago.
It is necessary to post the glacial chronology here in order to establish the concept of a timeline between the Quaternary glacial period and the interglacial period. Entering the ice age at will is the habit of many people.
Li Hui said that "1 million years ago, the craftsmen who remained in Africa suddenly mutated into early Homo sapiens", which is Li Hui's personal theory, which requires Li Hui to have an explanation for the Homo sapiens who appeared in Africa 1 million years ago. If Li Hui had the genome of "early Homo sapiens" from Africa 1 million years ago, it should be released as soon as possible. At present, it is nothing, and it is deceiving the Chinese public.
Li Hui fabricated the early African Homo sapiens in Africa 1 million years ago in order to merge the early Homo sapiens Neanderthals, Denisovans, and Rhodesians who appeared in Eurasia and Africa into the descendants of the "early Homo sapiens" in Africa 1 million years ago. I would like to tell you that it is also wrong to say that Neanderthals are Neanderthals of Europe, Neanderthals are distributed in northern Asia, Europe, Central and Western Asia, and there are Neanderthals in northern China. Denisovans are mainly distributed in western China, from the Altai Mountains in the north to the Yunnan tibet in the south. Denisovans did not enter Western Asia, Africa; Neanderthals did not enter Africa.
Li Hui said that 800,000 years ago, there were probably no early African Homo sapiens out of Africa. 800,000 to 680,000 years ago, it is the second ice age of the Quaternary. Africans go out of Africa to find death.
Li Hui also played with geographical barriers and ice ages. Li Hui said: "By 700,000 years ago, the world began to enter the ice age, sub-Saharan Africa, Eurasia west and east, geographically isolated, homo sapiens in the three places gradually divided into Three subspecies of Rhodesians in Africa, Neanderthals in Europe and Denisovans in Asia." "The concept of this ice age doesn't know where it came from or who it learned from. The three large geographical intervals formed by geographical barriers are correct, but the cause of the formation has nothing to do with the glacial period. The three major geographical divisions are the result of the last uplift movement of the Roof Ridge Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. The roof ridge, the Tibetan Plateau, was formed 2.5 million years ago, the Sahara Desert was formed 2.5 million years ago, and the Loess Plateau was piled up 2.48 million years ago.
Li Hui said that 74,000 years ago, modern people came out of Africa. Here Li Hui also replaced "the ancestors of modern people, early Homo sapiens out of Africa" with "modern people out of Africa", which is a transformation of the previous out of Africa, the purpose of the transformation is to maintain the "early African Homo sapiens that appeared 1 million years ago" proposed by Li Hui. Earlier, he changed the homo erectus out of Africa to the early Homo sapiens out of Africa. Earlier, the original out of Africa said that the humanoid out of Africa was changed to homo erectus out of Africa. This transformation should be said to have been transformed after studying many rebuttal articles that I (Li Hui said that people who claim to be independent scholars have written many articles to refute). However, I learned a fur and made it.
The reason for the 74,000-year-old out of Africa, Li Hui said, was a "multi-based catastrophe." The Dopa Catastrophe is the great eruption of The Dopa Volcano on the Indonesian island of Sumatra, with an equivalent of nearly 1,000 Mount Vesuvius eruptions, bringing great disasters to the world's organisms. I have also discussed it, but I have dealt with it as the reason for the arrival of the last ice age of the Quaternary Period. The large eruption of the Dopa Volcano does not affect Africa, it affects Southeast Asia, South Asia and southern China, the impact time is 70,000 to 60,000 years ago, and the continuous effect is to cause temperature drops, resulting in the early arrival of the last glacial period of the Quaternary. This time caused cooling and atmospheric pollution, forcing people in Eurasia to migrate north sequentially or in descending orders under the condition of cooling, and the population entering the high latitudes and alpine regions was almost extinct.
Fortunately, there was a recent eruption of the Tonga volcano, and the current observation is that the impact area of the Tonga volcanic eruption is so large. The follow-up effects may continue, most likely to facilitate the Early Entry of the Earth into a new ice age. But there is currently no impact on Africa.
Therefore, the eruption of the Dopa Volcano is not enough to cause Africans to leave Africa. Not enough to cause Homo sapiens in Eurasia (i.e., Neanderthals and Denisovans) to become endangered, nor to clear the way for modern humans to leave Africa. The point is that it is not enough to stimulate the desire of Africans to go out of Africa.
Again, li hui was told that genetic mutations are not random mutations, and mutations are often accompanied by great changes in the earth's environment (geographical environment, temperature environment, ecological environment, etc.), otherwise it is not enough to produce mutations.
I wrote a paper of more than 400,000 words for this.
The hypothesis that the grasslands promoted the standing of ancient apes proposed by the primitive African theory is inherited in my "Theory of the Origin of Mankind in China". However, the primitive grassland theory proposes that the reason for the formation of the grassland is that the formation of the Great Rift Valley in East Africa 12 million years ago led to the formation of the steppe ground on one side of the East African Grand Canyon with the forest floor on one side and the grassland ground on the other, and the ancient apes on the grassland landform evolved into Homo erectus (I call it homo erectus or ape). I think this prairie formation theory is wrong. It is said that this Great Rift Valley formed the East African savannah, which set the origin of mankind in Africa in the name of science. Through the study of paleoclimate paleogeography, I have given the reason for the formation of grassland landforms: the dry and cold climate that began 18 million years ago. According to the principle of dry and cold climate and grassland landform formation, it is proposed that the ancient ape began in the northern part of Eurasia, continued to stand up, continued to relay from north to south, and finally distributed in southern Eurasia and Africa at the end of the Tertiary Period (3 million years ago). The earliest Homo erectus should have appeared in northern Eurasia, dating back 18 million years.
In this way, the formation of the ape is diverse, and diversity is multi-origin.
This hypothesis of mine has actually been confirmed by archaeology. According to the article "Human Origins Are Not African, Scientists Discover That 12 Million Years Ago Human Ancestors Learned to Walk Upright": Scientists published a study in which they found the remains of an ancient ape in a silt pit in Bavaria, Germany, showing that human ancestors began walking upright millions of years earlier than previously thought (i.e. 12 million years ago). This news has not had some impact in China.
Early Chinese Homo sapiens also showed diversity in form. Early Homo sapiens fossils excavated from various parts of China show a variety of morphological characteristics. Li Hui believes that it is a small regional variation and denies diversity. The reason for denying the diversity of early Chinese Homo sapiens fossils is to deny that East Asia is the origin of Homo sapiens.
As for the origin of the African race, it has been scattered before, and there is no monograph. 3 million years ago, African apes were formed, and African apes entered Western Asia and also produced indigenously. But Africa did not go through the emergency effects of the last uplift movement on the Tibetan Plateau, so intelligence did not undergo sudden evolution. 2.5 million years ago, Western European archaic ape-type Homo sapiens migrated to East Africa, driven by the shock of the last uplift movement on the Tibetan Plateau. Therefore, East African archaic humans are more advanced than other African apes. 900,000 years later, there were also East Asian and Western European archaic humans entering Africa, but whenever they entered, they entered Africa, and evolution was relatively stagnant! This is also the root cause of the large number of primitive types in Africa. The Rhodesians of Africa were formed by the Heidelberg people of Europe who migrated south into Africa after being expelled from the Ice Age of Rees. During the modern Homo sapiens period, Neanderthals did not enter Africa because modern Homo sapiens had the intellectual level that recognized that Africa could not enter.
In the case of entering modern society, African society is still in a primitive state, and it is to fool modern humans as apes. It has nothing to do with science and has nothing to do with racial discrimination.
The following figures can basically express the origin, formation and migration of my apes and apes (homo sapiens). Posted here.
