Just last night, Honor officially released the Magic4 series, but what I didn't expect was that Honor Magic4 seemed to be "mixed" with the screen this time, which made BOE and Visionox, the two domestic mobile phone screen manufacturers, even quarrel, I don't know who you will support?
BOE said that the Honor Magic4 series is fully equipped with BOE screens, it is clear that if it is based on this statement of BOE, then Honor Magic4 and Honor Magic4pro should use BOE's screens.
But soon we also saw that Visionox also released news that the Honor Magic4 was supplied by Visionox, and also said that it was the first domestic LTPO Amoled screen used. Obviously, Visionox does not agree with the statement that "the Honor Magic4 series is fully equipped with BOE screens".
Combining the opinions of the two domestic mobile phone screen manufacturers, in the end we should be able to draw a more accurate conclusion, honor magic4 should be BOE and Visionox two mobile phone screen mixed use, and honor magic4 Pro uses BOE's screen. In other words, BOE directly uses the expression "Honor Magic4 series is fully equipped with BOE screen", but does not mention Visionox, such a statement is not rigorous, but also easy to mislead consumers, after all, the suppliers of the two screens are not the same, their products will not have experience deviations, and now they have not been sold, so we still do not know.
In addition, according to the product point of view, honor magic4 and honor magic4 Pro are using curved screens, of which the standard version of the surface rate pair is relatively small, and the Pro version of the surface rate is very large. Here I also express some problems that may exist with the Honor Magic4 Pro, expressing concern, what are the pros and cons of the Honor Magic4 Pro that uses the large curvature surface?
Benefits: Mobile phones with large curved rates can make the border of the phone narrower, improve the visual effect of the front of the phone, and look as if there is no border.
Disadvantages: 1, the large surface rate is easy to make the middle frame part of the mobile phone become smaller, so that it will reduce the protection of the middle frame, the risk of falling and breaking, and the cost of the curved screen is very expensive; 2, the large surface rate mobile phone is easy to cause the edge of the curved screen to produce a "green edge", there is a chromatic aberration in the display visual effect, and the edge of the early curved screen is even prone to burn-in phenomenon; 3, the large curved surface rate is very easy to bring false touch, because the edge of the mobile phone is also a screen, if you want to operate in this area , then means that the risk of accidental touch will also increase, especially when playing games and watching movies.
Nowadays, smart phones have done a better job in border control, not as much as the improvement of the positive effect of the mobile phone when the curved screen design was first launched, and now most of the Android flagship mobile phones have adopted a curved screen, but they have basically changed to a micro-curved rate screen. Apple's iPhone has not even used a curved screen mobile phone, but with a straight screen, and even many mobile phone manufacturers are following up on the direct screen design, even the first Samsung to do the curved screen, now the Samsung S22 series of curved rate is also shrinking, BOE Although it may be the exclusive glory Magic4Pro supply, but the glory has not solved the three problems that exist in the large curved rate screen, we may need further verification.
BoE and Visionox this time about the "Glory Magic4 series" screen supply storm, both sides did not mention each other, but for consumers may have to face the problem of choosing who, after all, the Glory Magic4 should be a mixture of two mobile phone screens, and you will be more who this is?