#Shenzhen Headline#Qiu Ge's Saying: This is a very surprising folk borrowing story. Due to the twists and turns of the content and drama, Qiu Ge wrote it in detail and could not be flattened

#Shenzhen Headline#Qiu Ge Said:

This is a very surprising folk borrowing story. Due to the tortuous and dramatic nature of the content, Qiu Ge wrote it in detail and could not do the usual style of writing - short and concise.

The protagonist, Mr. Wu Lao, is 83 years old this year, but he is in good spirits, kind and kind, and looks very energetic, without a little old man's twilight old age. Last night, when Brother Qiu was drinking tea in the tea room of his good friend Lin Zong, Mr. Wu was also present, and when Mr. Lin introduced Brother Qiu as a senior legal worker, Mr. Wu was very interested and immediately consulted Brother Qiu about a surprising, laughable, angry, and worrying story.

This story is personally experienced by Mr. Wu Lao, not fictional. The reason why it is a story is because the process of the fact is also a certain illusion, or with a little black humor, which is unbelievable.

Here's how it went. Old Mr. Wu did not know when he met a young offspring and lent him money. Although it is borrowed, it is not completely borrowed, but it is said to be "kept". That's a bit of a baffling statement, isn't it? Well, listen to Brother Qiu in detail.

Originally, this offspring that Mr. Wu knew was about thirty years old (when did he know, how did he know, Wu Lao did not say), surnamed Chen, as for what name the other party was called, he did not know, only knew that his surname was Chen (whether it was really surnamed Chen, but also a question mark). Last year, citing the severe economic difficulties of the epidemic, the young man borrowed 200,000 yuan from Mr. Wu to open a restaurant. I don't know what kind of motivation and mood Mr. Wu lao has, but he is also willing to help and support this young man to start a business. That is to say, Mr. Wu believed this ghost story of the afterlife, and really lent him his pension money, which was 200,000 yuan, and did not calculate interest. Unexpectedly, just a few months later, the young man closed the store, the person did not know where to go, and also blocked Mr. Wu's WeChat, and the phone could not be called. What is puzzling is that Mr. Wu does not even know where this young man is and who is of the family. However, Mr. Wu also left a "little clever": it turned out that when Mr. Wu borrowed money, he was afraid that the statute of limitations would pass, and did not ask the other party to write an IOU and repayment period, but asked the other party to write a "custody note". Mr. Wu did not show Brother Qiu what the "note of depository" was and what the content was, but from Mr. Wu's words, he probably knew that the content of the "note" meant to let the young man "keep" the 200,000 yuan in cash for him, and let the young man put a handprint on the "note", write the ID card number (if the ID card number is true, the name address can also be queried, the question is true?). Doubtful). The real meaning of Mr. Wu is that if the young man does not repay his money at that time, the statute of limitations will not expire, because this is to "keep" the money for him. At the same time, if the other party really violates the contract, its behavior is considered to be encroachment, and its legal responsibility can be pursued. Listening, it seems a bit reasonable, but what do you think is wrong?

Brother Qiu finally asked Wu Laosheng whether he was giving cash to the other party or bank transfer when he borrowed money? Answer to give the other party cash (I lean, a total of 200,000 cash!). Asked if there was any witness testimony, other circumstantial evidence, or anything like that, Elder Wu shook his head. In this regard, Qiu Ge inhaled a cold breath: this is just a "custody" note, whether it is to pursue the criminal responsibility or civil liability of young people, this evidence is lonely evidence, far away, too thin! Brother Qiu was deeply troubled, and he really had no clue at once what kind of legal relationship the "cash custody" behavior between them really belonged to. But for Mr. Wu Lao's borrowing money (the name is custody is actually borrowing money?). Or is it called borrowing money for actual safekeeping? The behavior is really deeply surprising, can not be evaluated, do not know what kind of god operation, so that qiu ge, who thinks he is well-informed, can't help but laugh and cry.

In the end, Mr. Wu said that he did not want to complain about this young man, but the other party's business losses blackened his circle of friends and cut off the behavior of telephone contact, this nature has changed, the behavior is bad, this is a kind of villain behavior that does not pay attention to integrity and righteousness, very immoral. Therefore, he was very angry and had to go to court in order to give the young offspring a just warning. However, when he was separated from Brother Qiu, he said that he would consider whether to sue this unscrupulous offspring again. Speechless.

Brother Qiu believes that Mr. Wu's words cannot be said to be incorrect, but the story of his borrowing (custody) of money with this young man is really strange, is this feeling a feeling of a farmer and a snake story? Is Mr. Wu too kind or too pedantic or old and confused, or is this young offspring too despicable and rogue, or is he originally a liar who uses the kindness of the old man to commit fraud? In short, what this young offspring did was fraud or embezzlement? Or is it borrowing or unjust enrichment? Brother Qiu is not easy to judge, here to ask for advice from all friends, let you judge it. (Good morning, everyone)