In recent times, we have occasionally seen teachers at a particular school being dismissed for participating in paid make-up classes. The teacher was expelled from the make-up class, which can be regarded as a top punishment. But when I delved into what kind of teacher the make-up teacher was, I found that this kind of teacher was most likely a substitute teacher.
Most of the people who are dismissed for make-up classes are substitute teachers? Why is it that every time "injured" is a "temporary worker" such as a substitute teacher? The school wants to let the substitute teachers not make up the lessons, and I have a plan: that is, as the principal, you can prevent this from happening by paying more money.
(1) Substitute teachers make up lessons, and the treatment is too "exquisite" is a factor.
The monthly salary of regular teachers is generally about three or four thousand, while the salary income of substitute teachers is generally about one or two thousand, and substitute teachers can only pay salaries for 10 months or even 9.5 months per year. If the family only relies on the substitute tuition of a substitute teacher to survive, it will be a very sad thing, because the family expenses are not as small as we think: chai rice oil, salt, sauce and vinegar tea, electricity and electricity bills for children's tuition, plus if the substitute teacher's menstrual period is at the end of the month, maybe by the last few days of the month, the aunt towel can not afford to buy.
In this case, if the substitute teacher does not make up the lessons, life will inevitably be particularly difficult. But the problem is that under the double reduction, not to mention substitute teachers, that is, social education and training institutions can not participate in the main subject tuition on weekdays, and teachers make up classes have become "charged high-voltage lines". If you want to let the substitute teacher not make up the class, I think the best way is for the school to greatly improve the treatment of substitute teachers, so that substitute teachers do not have too many worries in material life, if the treatment is improved or there are substitute teachers to make up lessons, directly clean up and let the relevant departments confiscate the illegal gains, so that people can be convinced.
(2) High salary and low cost, substitute teachers and front-line formal teachers can be used.
In addition to the more economically developed areas such as Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Jiangsu, the salaries of school teachers in most areas are not high, at least compared with people in other industries, there is still a lot of room for improvement. Under the double reduction, in fact, not only some substitute teachers are desperate to participate in paid make-up classes, but also many in-service teachers are also eager to move, and some even use "tunnel warfare" and "guerrilla warfare" to avoid the "risks" brought about by make-up classes. To put it bluntly, one of the reasons why this situation is very important is because of one word: poor!
Pulling out the root causes of poverty, curing poverty and disease, and improving the treatment of primary and secondary school teachers, especially rural teachers, are the key to building a defense line that front-line teachers "cannot make up, dare not make up, and do not want to make up." Using high salaries to alleviate the participation of substitute teachers and front-line formal teachers in paid make-up classes should be regarded as the most exquisite trick. After this trick is used up, those education practitioners who have violated the law and discipline again dare to make up classes in violation of the law, and they should be expelled, dismissed, fined, and no longer need to talk about any situation.
(3) Substitute teachers make up lessons because of loopholes in school supervision.
Some people think that the object of double subtraction is students, the object of prohibiting teachers from making up classes is in-service teachers, sometimes even school leaders think so, and even some principals directly mobilize substitute teachers to let students participate in paid make-up classes to improve students' performance, it is precisely because of the loopholes in school supervision and the lack of understanding of the school's senior management, which leads to substitute teachers taking risks, directly treating students as "cutting a stubble of leeks"... Therefore, I personally feel that before dealing with substitute teachers to make up lessons, it is best to give a free "gift" to the school's leader a more powerful punishment, and the accountability board is accurate and painful, so that the phenomenon of substitute teachers making up lessons can be cured.
Do you have any tips for eliminating the phenomenon of front-line teachers and substitute teachers making up lessons? Welcome to leave a message to communicate.