Someone asked me a question: Why did the predecessor of the Civic Party, that is, the "anti-China chaos in Hong Kong" of the gang, insist on obtaining Hong Kong residency for these people in the Zhuang Fengyuan case and the hong Kong right of residence incident of foreign domestic workers? What good does this actually do them?
No one can answer this question, and I believe that even Yu Ruowei, Liang Jiajie, and Wu Yiyi, the principals, cannot answer it, because they seem to be very knowledgeable on the surface, but in their bones they are just dead readers, and they only have professional knowledge, and there is no real stupidity to learn, and they can only scare the ignorant and foolish.
I believe that the reason why they proposed these policies is only at the behest of the United States, to engage in stupid puppetry, and at their level, they will not be able to think of a real answer for a hundred years. Such a group of idiots, Yu Ruowei and Liang Jiajie have intelligence and do not go to jail, I believe that in the past life accumulated a lot of yin virtue, Wu Yiyi's ancestors accumulated less yin virtue, so unlucky, and so on.
In the Zhuang Fengyuan case and the right of foreign domestic helpers to reside in Hong Kong, there is only one answer, that is, the United States and britain intend to raise some unsolvable issues and force China to amend the Basic Law. Who knew that China knew about the conspiracy of the British and American ghost animals and resolutely refused to revise it.
So why did the West intend to get China to amend the Basic Law? That's got to make me tell a story.
It is said that there is a place in Europe called "Shleswig-Holstein", and to say who is the sovereignty of this place, its complexity, in the middle of the nineteenth century, only 3 people understood, and one of these 3 people died, one was nervous, and the other forgot. (It was Prince Alba who died, the university professor who went mad, and the Prime Minister of the British Empire who forgot.) ）
Since we can't understand it, we can only resort to war. Denmark and Austria fought a war, which lost, signed a treaty, and relinquished suzerainty over Shleswig-Holstein.
Originally, this story came to an end. But it wasn't long before Denmark amended its constitution and demanded that Shleswig-Holstein abide by it as well. So, the opportunity came.
Austria's argument is that the treaty signed that year, voluntarily renouncing the suzerainty of Shleswig-Holstein, was based on the previous Danish constitution, and now Denmark has amended it, that is, it violates the treaty, so the treaty is invalid, and Austria can refute it.
Knowing that Austria was not a rival to Denmark, it sought prussia, which was also Germanic, and declared war on Denmark, with the result that the rising Prussia was victorious, laying the foundation for its later unification of Germany.
This article was originally published in Orange News, and the original title was "Why the West Is Doing Everything Possible to Change China's Basic Law"