Lenovo should learn well
In the past 2021, the most controversial technology company should be Lenovo, and there are three main points of doubt, one of which is to question the annual salary of Lenovo's senior management is too high, because according to the financial report data released by Lenovo, the annual salary of Yang Yuanqing, the second-generation head of Lenovo, has exceeded 100 million, and the annual salary of Liu Chuanzhi, the founder of Lenovo who has retired, is also close to 100 million yuan.
The second is that the network big V Sima Nan openly questioned whether Lenovo had lost state-owned assets on social platforms.
The third is to question Lenovo, as a technology company that was once controlled by a state-owned company, and now its investment in research and development in the technology field has been declining year after year.
Based on these three aspects, there has been a lot of condemnation for Lenovo, but in the face of this image crisis, Lenovo has not launched an honor defense war like in 2018, which undoubtedly makes the outside world think.
After the example of Lenovo, the outside world also began to compare Lenovo and Huawei, after all, in the early 2000s, the domestic technology circle had the saying of "North Lenovo, South Huawei", which shows that Lenovo and Huawei were technology companies in the domestic market at that time.
Nowadays, when the outside world compares Huawei and Lenovo together, there seems to be a gap between the two, first of all, in terms of technical level, needless to say, today's Huawei is at the forefront of the world in terms of operating system, communication technology, semiconductor chips, unmanned driving, etc., which Lenovo has been incomparable, and secondly, in terms of research and development investment, Lenovo can not be compared with Huawei, because in the past few years, Huawei's research and development investment is the highest in China.
And on February 7, accompanied by a new news, it seems to mean that Lenovo really should reflect and study Hua.
Huawei announced its decision
Because it is reported that Huawei announced that it will take out 50 billion yuan to dividend employees, which would not have been too much of a problem, because half of Lenovo's annual revenue is also spent on talent salaries, but the difference is mainly concentrated in two aspects, one of which is that Huawei is in a difficult period, but in order to encourage the innovation enthusiasm of talents, Huawei is still willing to provide more benefits to employees.
Second, this dividend is not the majority of the high-level acquisition, because according to the data, the current Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei's shareholding ratio within Huawei is only 0.9%, although according to this ratio to share 50 billion yuan of dividends, Ren Zhengfei can still get far more than Yang Yuanqing's annual salary, but it should be noted that more than 99% of the 50 billion yuan is distributed to nearly 120,000 Huawei employees. Even some employees with higher contributions receive a higher proportion of dividends than Ren Zhengfei, the founder. The founders of this bold company alone do not have it.
When Yang Yuanqing responded to questions about his high annual salary, he said that his salary level could not be lower than that of his American employees.
Although this statement itself is no problem, the higher the position salary level is naturally higher, but from the perspective of the pattern Ren Zhengfei is the most high, Ren Zhengfei is willing to share Huawei's revenue more with employees, especially technical employees, and even do not mind that the employee's position salary is higher than their own, this talent management and distribution model, greatly motivating the enthusiasm of employees, making Huawei's profitability stronger, the funds that can be distributed become larger and more, even if Ren Zhengfei's shareholding ratio becomes very low, But it is still possible to share in huge returns.
I have to say that Ren Zhengfei is indeed not ordinary.
summary
In this regard, Huawei has indeed done the best, in terms of talent, Huawei is not stingy, and it can even be said that it is responsive, and it is this model that promotes Huawei to have the world's top R & D team. On the contrary, the top management of the company that pays too much attention to money has fallen behind in development.
Do you think Lenovo should learn from Huawei's talent management distribution model?