laitimes

How big a gap is there between our first-move principle and Musk's first principle

As we all know, Musk has had great commercial success using the first principles of physics, and we have also done a great job using the first-move principle.

How big a gap is there between our first-move principle and Musk's first principle

The success of the first principle is the victory of the laws of physics, and the success of the first principle is the victory of business operation.

"Heaven and earth are not kind, and all things are dogs", the laws of physics have no humanity, and all things obey and are subject to the laws.

How big a gap is there between our first-move principle and Musk's first principle

The first principle, on the other hand, exploits human nature. One trick, eat all over the sky. This trick is the result of artificial planning, planning, in order to make the trick look fresher, whether it is a new bottle of old wine, or an old bottle of new wine, the purpose is to appear in a new posture, to mobilize and allocate resources.

The first principle corresponds to the technological innovation from 0 to 1, and the first principle corresponds to the model innovation from 1 to 99.

How big a gap is there between our first-move principle and Musk's first principle

Therefore, model innovation companies pay more attention to the research of big data, study customer resources and behaviors, portrait customers, look for demand pain points, and win in one move. New concepts, new packaging, new looks, and innovation are the core capabilities of model innovation.

The core ability of the first principle is minimalism, but the first principle is extremely complex.

Not minimalist is not enough to innovate, not extremely complex is not enough to be complete. Minimalism enables innovation, and extreme complexity gives freshness. Minimalism itself is the goal, while minimalism is designed to activate the need.

In a long supply chain, the first principle is close to the source, the first principle is close to the end, and both are indispensable. However, first principles come with the effect of the first-move principle, and the first-act principle, if not supported by the first-act principle, will appear empty and unsustainable.

From manufacturing to the Internet, we use too many first-trick principles, which seem to be hilarious, but we are taking most of the profits from the source.

The first trick is full of strategy, layout, and skills, and there is no big stroke, big pattern, big scene that capital can't pile up, and no problem that money can't solve. We believe too much in the power of skill, but only when we are cut off do we realize the importance of the source. It is not only technology that is cut off, but mathematics, physics, chemistry, those that require long-term investment, and the truth that has no humanity but is universal.

Lack of scientific and technological innovation, passive water model innovation began to innovate for the sake of innovation, lost the role of taking over the first baton of scientific and technological innovation, excessive model innovation has formed a new inner volume.

Therefore, Ren Zhengfei once said when talking about the chip crisis: "Chips can't just throw money, you have to smash mathematicians, chemists, physicists, and so on."

It can be seen that we need to sink our hearts, adjust industrial policies, form an atmosphere of intellectual property protection, adjust the educational structure, and cultivate basic talents, so that in a few years, we can cultivate talents who can use the first principles, get close to the source, and achieve continuous innovation.

Read on