With the improvement of the national economy, the "twin city life" that once belonged to the north drifter has also begun to spread in first- and second-tier cities. What is Twin Cities Life? It is not so romantic in words, but it is mixed with a slight cruelty in real life. It refers to people who work in one city, live in another, and live on the commuter line every day. Commuting is difficult, the transfer is tiring, and the time is long, so that many People in the Twin Cities are full of thorns on the road to chasing their dreams in big cities. In order to save more commuting time, many people will choose to buy a transportation model.
Skipping a wide variety of car brands and looking directly at the two major categories of fuel vehicles and electric vehicles, I believe this is also the first difficulty faced by commuter users. Today, let's compare the differences between the two types of models and see who is the "caramel macchiato" in your life.
As far as the current domestic situation is concerned, electric vehicle models have more advantages than fuel models. Under the influence of the global new energy wave, major automobile manufacturers have divened into the new energy door, whether it is an international veteran enterprise or a newly emerging Mengxin will take new energy as the main road of development. In this context, the retention rate and practicality of fuel models seem to fall off a cliff.
In fact, although new energy models have advantages in energy conservation and environmental protection, price and development prospects, infrastructure such as charging convenience, mileage and charging piles still restricts the development of new energy models. Therefore, for commuting to work to choose fuel or electric, you need to start according to your own situation, after all, turnip greens have their own love.
For users who want to start with electric models, what do you need to pay attention to? First of all, compared with the southern cities, the development of electric vehicles in the north has always stopped at a certain bottleneck. The shrinking mileage in winter, the difficulty of igniting cars, and the limited development of charging piles have hindered the commuting dreams of electric vehicles in northern consumers, and they can only taste through hybrid models.
According to the "China New Energy Vehicle City Liuzhou Model Big Data Report", as of September 2021, in the proportion of pure electric passenger cars in various cities in the entire passenger car market, only one in Beijing has entered the top ten of the list, and Didu has once again taken up the title of "lonely family". Therefore, in order to achieve the freedom of commuting in electric vehicles, it is best to work in the south of friends.
In addition to geographical factors, deterministic charging piles are also an important factor in achieving electric commuting. For commuters who spend their days with cars, cars are a second home. Unlike the straight-forward approach of fuel models, electric models are like smartphones and need to be recharged in time. Therefore, if you want to buy an electric model as a commuting tool, you must have a charging pile at home, at work, and in the surrounding areas that can be used for a long time. Otherwise, in addition to enduring the pain of commuting every day, you must also bear the joy of "finding a charging pile friend". In addition, inversely proportional to the high-speed fuel saving of fuel models, the more the electric vehicle model faces long-distance and high-speed road sections, the more expensive it will be, and it is more suitable for commuting in the middle of the urban area.
In summary, I personally believe that in order to achieve the freedom of electric commuting, it is best to meet the three major elements of moderate temperature in the region throughout the year, mainly short and medium commuting, and stable number of charging piles.
In today's popularity of electric models, who is more suitable for fuel models? First of all, for users with endurance anxiety, compared with the fuel model that goes straight, the biggest drawback of the electric model is probably subject to the charging pile. This has also led to users like me being very afraid of the problem of breaking down halfway. Therefore, for those who do not have the conditions to install charging piles or do not have stable charging piles, electric vehicles are like bombs that can explode at any time.
Men are teenagers until death, and even an uncle with a successful career cannot refuse the motivation of "smoking black smoke and bursting into deafening waves". Compared with quiet electric vehicles, the maneuverability and power output of fuel vehicles have absolute advantages, which is also an important selling point of today's fuel models. Therefore, for those young people who want to experience speed and passion in the boring commuting life, fuel models are more cost-effective.
In summary, in my personal opinion, fuel models are more suitable for users with endurance anxiety, long-distance high-speed, and expected power output.
At last:
Many people like to turn the false proposition that electric vehicle models are more cost-effective in terms of economy, and subconsciously transform them into real propositions. But in fact, this is only the result of simply calculating the daily travel electricity bill, if the replacement battery cost, low retention rate and high wear rate are added to it, there will not be much gap with the fuel model.
When purchasing commuter vehicles, users must consider rationally and do not blindly buy electric vehicle models with the flow. If you don't have the infrastructure in place, then sorry, you might as well buy a bike. Especially for friends in the north, especially in the northeast, you must not buy electric vehicles whimsically, otherwise it is difficult to find a receiver if you want to shoot.