First, netizens broke the news that students smashed the museum's cultural relics and claimed 1.3 million
Yesterday (January 25), a netizen in Wuhan, Hubei Province, posted a multi-segment video fermented on the Internet, which caused widespread concern among netizens.
By January 25, through the netizen's successive videos, it can be learned that when his children participated in the off-campus training winter camp, they smashed 1.3 million yuan of cultural relics in the museum.
Surveillance footage in the video shows that a statue without protective measures is placed in the corner of the exhibition area, at that time, next to the sculpture, there were many student activities, and a student was suspected of touching the sculpture when he passed, and the sculpture suddenly fell sideways and shattered, and the upper part fell and smashed.
The parents of the students involved in the incident said that the sculpture belonged to a private museum in Wuhan City, worth 1.3 million yuan, and the other party is now demanding compensation.
Second, the museum responded, and the form of the event was reversed
But according to a January 25 report by the Beijing Youth Daily, the museum staff said that the damaged exhibits were bought from Japan nine years ago, costing more than 200,000 yuan, and the museum never said that the exhibits were worth 1.3 million yuan (as can be seen in the recording of the call with the parents), and it is impossible to claim compensation in this way.
In this regard, the staff of the museum also made a corresponding reply:
(1) The tomb figurines in Zhejiang Town are not 1.3 million
(2) The party calling the police is not a museum
(3) The museum has never extorted research institutions and parents of children
(4) It is still in the consultation stage
According to the news released by the museum's only live witness staff, the situation was also reversed
The news that the online hot rumor museum demanded 1.3 million yuan in compensation is a rumor, and the compensation of 1.3 million yuan is actually an extracurricular research institution that holds a research and study.
Third, break the attitude of parents of cultural relics students
The attitude of the parents who really broke the cultural relics is so good, where does the video of the bankruptcy release on the Internet come from?
(Said "winter camp 1,000 yuan for 5 days, the result in the tragic result of 1.3 million yuan of cultural relics need to be compensated", "This is the rhythm of bankruptcy", "I want to let all the parents of children know how deep the pit of the off-campus training class is")
Fourth, the attitude and rhetoric of research institutions are not to reduce their own losses, or even profits
On the one hand, intimidating the parents of students with an astronomical number of ordinary people,
On the one hand, it continues to make profits according to this (calculating an account of 1.3 million to 1.3 million * 0.6-200,000, the proportion comes from its preliminary negotiations)
There is no way to know exactly how, so there is no longer speculation
Fifth, it is suspected that there are media operations and operations, and the "keyboard man" and "virgin" who do not understand the truth of the facts have a bright sword
According to staff, media operations are suspected
In the same third, the attitude of parents is obvious to all. So, who would have sent that video?
(Analysis: According to the general psychology of ordinary people, since it is not broken by their own children, they will think that this matter has nothing to do with their own family, so why call it bitter? Shouldn't it be to send videos and articles to shirk responsibility? ）
In this way, it seems that the people who posted the video could not have been malicious media, and false and untrue broadcasts were made. There is also the matter of buying a water army to attack the museum, is there a shadow of the media behind the purchase of the water army with rhythm?
Could it be that he felt that the weak individuals were not good at bullying, and began to cooperate with the trolls to attack the strong groups to eat human blood steamed buns
(This matter can refer to Liu Xuezhou's dynamics, there are malicious attacks by the water army.) For details, please click on the homepage to view the details. bemoan! ）
There is also the "keyboard man" and "virgin" with bright swords, on the principle of weakness is justice (do not misunderstand, not to blame children),
Without thinking, he began to attack the museum, but ignored the way things were.
It is normal to be curious about things and eat melons, but if you don't look at a thing dialectically, you just accept the information instilled by the media without hesitation. Does this count as indoctrination? Worth pondering!
Because in this matter, there was no official response from the museum at the beginning, and it was always just a netizen who appeared in the tone of the child's parents
(Please forgive me for the fact that my transmission information may also be incorrect due to the delay in the dissemination of factual evidence!) ）
The above statement can easily feel the hidden sadness, but it is not incomprehensible
After all, after understanding the matter, I found that my party has been endlessly insulted on the Internet,
And the reason for the insult is actually a nonsense
Sixth, in view of why the museum did not protect the cultural relics well, the staff made a corresponding explanation
First of all, at the beginning of the study activity, it has already reminded the students who participated in the activity
There are also many no-touch signs in the museum
And its museum is still in the development stage,
It can't achieve the top level of protection at the national level
(There may be another button touch, why exhibit without protection?)
Personal opinion: Like his point of view, it is still in the development stage of protection is not perfect)
Secondly, teachers also have certain responsibilities, and their preparation and supervision work is not yet in place
In its published article, it mentioned, "The video shows the teacher, you are chatting, you are playing with your phone"
"Teacher, the child reflects that you did not tell the children in advance"
So many children are not taken care of? "Teacher, you told me they were like that"
Moreover, because of the age of the children, respect for the museum artifacts has not yet been formed
Referring to the words of the staff member, I also remembered what the art teacher once said,
Museums or art galleries abroad (probably referring to only those he has been to) do not have most of the protection measures that netizens say
Note: It is not a sheepdog, but simply refers to the different forms of exhibitions in different countries
Seventh, netizens' doubts, if you are interested in this or have your own opinions, welcome to speak in the comment area
Articles represent only personal opinions, if there are errors (factual errors, sick sentences, typos, etc.), please point them out, so as not to mislead other readers
The cause of the error is mentioned above, the lag in message propagation and the limited amount of information learned
Original is not easy, here is to know Tiai, click a focus not to get lost!