Today we see a strange phenomenon.
In the watermelon video, I saw two hosts telling stories about the same story, and even the title was the same.
It was also on the hot search at the same time. I took all the screenshots and let's take a look at them. Is not true.
There is a question about whether this is documentary literature or a story. The credibility of the event is greatly reduced. It was very uncomfortable to watch.
The watermelon video has become a novel video.
Watermelon Video seems to be necessary to open a fiction column, everyone is telling stories, no matter how real he is, there is traffic on the line.
Borrowing, not plagiarism, borrowing should be quoting.
Can't remake it. It sounds quite real and provocative.
That's my point.
It may also be said that this is possible and can expand the impact.
What do you think, yes or no, can be remade.
Is it to separate storytelling from literary creation?
Documentary literature is distinguished from fiction storytelling and hearsay news.
To give the original a reasonable explanation, is the remake unethical?
Do I have to pay a fee?
