Doctors live-stream gynecological surgeries, and it is not only virtue that is missing

Source: Qianjiang Evening News

Recently, a suspected doctor's live broadcast of gynecological surgery occurred at Station B, which aroused public concern.

According to the netizens, he accidentally entered a live broadcast room of Station B on the afternoon of January 15, and learned from the conversation in the live broadcast room that an anesthesiologist was doing gynecological surgery on a female patient. After receiving the report, the Donggang Branch of the Public Security Bureau of Rizhao City, Shandong Province, immediately investigated the relevant personnel of the hospital involved and arrested the doctor Involved, Li Mou. The case is under further investigation.

"Want traffic crazy, right? Can gynecological surgery be broadcast live? "Eight lifetimes of virtue are missing!" ...... The news came out, triggering the anger of the whole network.

Live streaming is a big basket, and everything can be loaded into it. In order to earn traffic and obtain benefits, some anchors do not hesitate to create an "Internet celebrity effect" with strange, vulgar and vulgar performances. The doctor's live broadcast of gynecological surgery once again broke through the bottom line.

Live streaming gynecological surgery online, which is a joke on patient privacy. The condition itself is privacy, gynecological surgery is even more private, and it is extremely immoral to use it for live broadcasting. The doctor's live broadcast during the operation is also a manifestation of malfeasance, which increases the risk of surgery.

Live broadcasting of gynecological surgery is shameful, and the management negligence of the hospital involved is also to blame. According to netizens, during the live broadcast, the female patient asked a female doctor present whether the male personnel present were the doctors who operated on them, and the female doctor said that the person was an anesthesiologist. Unbeknownst to her knowledge, the female patient's surgery has been broadcast live by the anesthesiologist, "during which the anesthesiologist's colleagues have not stopped the act." It is common knowledge that gynecological surgery cannot be broadcast live, and didn't the other medical staff present feel inappropriate? So insensitive and intriguing.

Station B should bear certain regulatory responsibilities. According to the customer service staff of Station B, after internal inspection, the live broadcast room was repeatedly warned and cut off during the live broadcast on January 15, and then permanently banned. When such a serious problem is found, why not cut it off immediately, but also "warn many times"? There are also netizen messages, there are many videos of doctors treating patients on station B. Why does Station B, which is known as manual review, repeatedly expose infringements?

The Internet is not an extralegal place, and webcasting cannot be without borders. In recent years, some network anchors who have not hesitated to test the law have been banned and even sentenced. Anesthesiologists live-streaming gynecological surgeries should also be brought to justice. The Medical Practitioners Law clearly stipulates that physicians must protect patient privacy and personal information in accordance with the law in their practice activities. Where patients' privacy is leaked, causing serious consequences, they will be given a warning or ordered to suspend their practice activities for six months or more than one year; if the circumstances are serious, their practice certificates will be revoked; where a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility will be pursued in accordance with law.

Network live broadcasting, can not have no bottom line for traffic, for the eyeballs at all costs vulgar and vulgar, let alone infringe on the rights of others. Online live broadcasting must be standardized and developed in order to be stable and far-reaching.