Liaoning Liaoyang Baita: At the hearing, the effect of enterprise rectification was hung out

Justice Network News (reporter Zhang Yuhong, Liu Jian, correspondent Lu Jinyou) "This hearing makes us feel the judicial warmth of the procuratorial organs in escorting the development of private enterprises, and we must transform judicial care into a driving force for the development of enterprises and make greater contributions to local economic development!" Recently, the procuratorate of Baita District, Liaoyang City, Liaoning Province, held a public hearing on a case suspected of providing false supporting documents, said Feng Mou, the head of a company who is undergoing an inspection of corporate compliance construction.

When the company's person in charge, Feng X, and the business leader Zhang X, were entrusted to carry out a cost review of a certain project, driven by interests, the project cost was not confirmed in accordance with the procedures in the asset appraisal report, and the total project price was directly determined to be more than 7.8 million yuan. After the incident, the relevant departments re-examined the cost of the project, and the appraisal project cost should be more than 5.1 million yuan. Feng X and Zhang X were investigated for suspected crimes of providing false supporting documents.

In July 2021, after the case entered the review and prosecution stage, Feng and Zhang truthfully confessed the facts of the crime, returned all the stolen money and late fees, and expressed their willingness to admit guilt and accept punishment. At the same time, the company also applied to start the compliance inspection procedure of the enterprise involved in the case and submitted a compliance plan. After review, the Baita District Procuratorate found that the enterprises involved in the case and the relevant responsible personnel Feng X and Zhang X admitted guilt and accepted punishment for the facts of the crime, and there were circumstances such as voluntary surrender, first-time offenders, and less subjective malice, so it decided to start the enterprise compliance inspection procedure, entrusted the relevant administrative organs to form a third-party inspection agency, and introduced social professional forces as independent supervisors, and determined a three-month inspection period.

In order to abide by the law and operate in good faith, the company has specially hired legal advisers, invited professionals to carry out legal lectures many times, and plugged loopholes from the source through the establishment of rules and regulations. During this period, three compliance program implementation reports were also submitted.

At the hearing, the procurator introduced the basic facts of the case, and Feng Mou, the representative of the company involved in the case, made a detailed report on the compliance inspection of the enterprise. The inspection agency made a comprehensive evaluation of the company's compliance construction and believed that it had reached the expected goal and complied with relevant regulations. After discussion, the hearing officer unanimously agreed that the procuratorate would make a decision not to prosecute Feng and Zhang.

【Source: Justice Network】

Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author, if there is an error in the source or infringement of your legitimate rights and interests, you can contact us through the mailbox, we will deal with it in a timely manner. Email address: [email protected]