laitimes

Two villagers in Changting have a dispute over a dog

author:Longyan popularization of law

Nanshan Judicial Office Cleverly Judged the "Dog Dispute Case"

On January 3, 2022, Hua Xinhan, director of the Nanshan Judicial Office, received a phone call from Secretary Yi of Nantian Village, Nanshan Town, saying that two villagers in his village had disputed over a dog, and the dispute between the two sides had not been resolved after repeated mediation. Early in the morning of January 4, 2022, Hua Xinhan immediately went to Nantian Village in Nanshan Town to investigate.

Dispute Circumstances

Through the investigation and inquiry of the village committee and the parties on both sides, it was learned that a female dog raised by the party Yi Mouhui gave birth to two paparazzi, about 10 pounds, and two months ago, one of the puppies ran to the home of Yi Mouchang, the head of the village, and then raised about 15 kilograms in Yi Mouhui's home, and has not returned to the "mother's house". A few days ago, the party Yi Mouhui went to the home of Yi Mouhui at the head of the village to play poker, and when he returned home, the puppy went back to his "mother's house", and the yi mouhui of the village found the family of Yi Mouhui at the end of the village, found that the puppy was in his home, and claimed that this dog was bought by him two months ago in the town to collect money, so he used an iron chain to directly lead the puppy back to his home, and the two sides had a dispute, and the village committee organized consultation and mediation between the two sides for many times and still did not resolve it.

Two villagers in Changting have a dispute over a dog

Mediation process

In the process of mediation, Hua Xinhan learned that the owner of the female dog, Yi Mouhui, said that this puppy was his own family, with a coat color and appearance like a female dog, and the size was also similar to that of the same breed puppy. Yi Mouchang said that this dog was bought for 150 yuan two months ago, and he has fattened up five or six pounds for more than two months. Yi Mouchang proposed that if he wanted to lead the dog back, let the owner of the female dog, Yi Mouhui, pay her 200 yuan. Yi Mouhui said that this is his family's dog, up to 50 yuan of parenting fees, the public said that the public is reasonable, the mother said that the wife is reasonable, the two sides can not argue.

At this time, Hua Xinhan proposed two solutions: First, although the animal cannot speak, the animal is humane and affectionate, and leads the dog to the door of Secretary Yi in the middle of the village, one lives at the head of the village, one lives at the end of the village, one goes up, one goes down, Secretary Yi stands in the middle and loosens the dog chain, and the dog chooses its owner, and who it is willing to go with is whose dog. Second, the dog was bought by a third party at the market price of 300 yuan, and the proceeds were divided equally between the two people.

Two villagers in Changting have a dispute over a dog

Mediation results

In the end, under the patient communication and coordination of the village committee and Hua Xinhan, both sides agreed to choose the second plan, selling the dog to a third party for 300 yuan, and the two sides each received 150 yuan. At the mediation site, Secretary Yi of Nantian Village took out 300 yuan on the spot, and each person received 150 yuan. The dispute over the dog was thus resolved satisfactorily.

Case Review

The subtleties show the truth, and the little things warm the hearts of the people. This dispute seems to be just a small thing, but it is not simple. First, the animal cannot speak, and there is no way to take the initiative to provide effective evidence; second, both parties have the grace to raise the puppy, one side is the "mother's family", the other party is the "in-laws"; the third is that it is difficult to collect evidence in such dispute cases, and it is necessary to analyze the specific problems. Hua Xinhan, director of the Nanshan Judicial Institute, skillfully judged the "dog contest case," started with rural customs and habits, always insisted on grasping small things, grasping early, and grasping the sprouts, resolving contradictions and disputes at the grass-roots level, starting from small things with practical actions, doing good things, doing practical things, and accomplishing things for the masses, and winning the unanimous praise of the masses.

Source: Changting Justice

Edit: Huang Qinghua

Inspection: Ling Jiatao

Review: Lai Minhua Chen Liangjin

The copyright belongs to the original author, if there is any infringement, please contact in time

Read on