A partnership model scam?

One of the hottest words in the workplace in the past two years is "partner", and I think everyone has heard of it and is even experiencing such a fact. What is the real partnership model, let's not talk about it today, in turn we have to talk about what are the pits here? Even a scam!

Recently, one of the companies with a very strong background claims to have technical barriers (more than 200), talent barriers (their own vocational schools), capital advantages (acquired listed companies), financial advantages (consortium + professional incubator team), product barriers (national exclusive, absolute efficacy), industrial chain advantages (to create diversified industrial clusters), scientific and technological barriers (backed by many research institutes), business model barriers (to create a commercial aggregation ecological model of one product, one industry and one base), market competitive advantage (80% Net profit taken out and directly distributed to the market)... So many advantages, frankly I was really impressed after listening to it! I also saw the determination and will of some shareholders! The next step is to talk about cooperation. I was because one of my big brothers got into this platform company.

Given that I am currently in office and there are still many things to choose from, I hope that the cooperation opportunities and the distribution framework will be explained at the beginning of the cooperation. But before he could speak, the eldest brother said a lot, such as discussing the thinking of business operators. I'll understand in seconds! Later, he also added that the top-level core team is still recruiting, and there is no shortage of talents! The most important thing is that several of them immediately "retreat cultivation", involving strategic top-level design, business model polishing, etc. Invite me to get involved! It's no coincidence that these two days I have a week of senior management meetings. So, it's sad in time. That's fine, the most important thing is that our next chat made me feel a little uneasy. So take it out and share it for everyone to discuss and communicate.

In this case, I tentatively asked several questions, such as the positioning of the key core, the estimated proportion of profit sharing, the weight of discourse, the way of dividing shares, and the estimated proportion of salary design... Before I could finish speaking, he directly interrupted me and criticized me for not opening my mind! I immediately asked, what does the eldest brother think is wrong? He said that the manager's thinking is to have the mentality of the boss! At present, the model of part-time work has only one dead end in the modern enterprise management model! A new mechanism for the partnership model must be constructed. I said: Yes. (I've been giving him affirmations later on, theoretically yes) What's the problem? The big brother replied directly that this is a complex topic, the premise of the first negotiation of the conditions is that both sides must have a certain foundation of trust, which takes time to run in, through a period of time, some things, so that shareholders will see your attitude and style of doing things, and even the size of your ability. Then come back to the so-called conditions! In layman's terms, it is to identify first, come in and then say. Big Brother actually meant it well, and he was right! But I think that even if the manager's mentality is equivalent to the boss mentality≠ don't talk about conditions! Even if there is no deep trust, there must be at least initial recognition! All "employing people" is through preliminary communication and "knowing people"! As long as there is a certain amount of wisdom, people can judge the other party's ability, open vision and problem-solving ability through short communication. Therefore, I always think that cooperation without conditions will make me cheaper! Not to mention that I'm not exhausted yet!

I used to believe in such platforms, founders, shareholder teams, etc., but the result? I don't want to make that mistake again! Although I also agree with what the eldest brother said, such as coming first, for example, becoming a shareholder in the future and becoming a CEO, the annual salary of one million is not a problem! Indeed, however, I must remain reasonable. As everyone knows, it is possible to play a good hand of cards. This situation can never be ruled out.

Since there is no shortage of anything, I also believe in the strength of the platform. Companies also have their own attitude. Since there is a lack of partners like the talent echelon. That also has to be the attitude and chips to recruit partners. At the end of the conversation, I said, "Please forgive my doubts and expectations about this cooperation!" Turning uncertainty into certainty is what a true entrepreneurial team should look like! I also understand what you said, the so-called cultivation of trust, need to experience and run together. However, you have not considered, qualified or not, I believe that everyone has no standard, in the end, whether it is ok or not, and then talk about paying more and less, and then talking about more and less points, it will hurt feelings! The most important thing is that as an independent personality, I seem to be very passive! Fate seems to be in the hands of others. I always believe in the phrase "divide the money, make a good dream, and be at peace"!

Later in the conversation, I very sincerely said that you are my most respected big brother! Just didn't expect him to reply directly that he didn't need it. Ha ha. I can't go on talking, I feel that he is emotional, so I euphemistically say that what he said is too illusory, whether you need my respect or not, it does not matter. Are values valuable in the face of reality? Winning is the best value! Since the company is clear that there is no shortage of partners, it must have an attitude and chips. Even if you don't get a penny, there must be something else to replace. Instead of seemingly "brainwashing" in a way, after all, there are too many people who are better than you and me, as long as you are willing to smash. He responded to everything I said by Steve Jobs to Coca-Cola President Sculley in 1983, but I still think it's better to be grounded! Today's market environment is very different, rather than the nihilistic change of the world, I may be more inclined to the wife and baby hot kangtou! (Maybe really, as he says, I'm a low-level fantasist) In this real world, I've seen too much of it. Believe our experience tells us that it is the nature of all human beings to be profit-oriented. The essence of everyone is win-win cooperation, hoping to talk about brotherhood and righteousness and divide us a little more, which is a joke! Value parity and interchange are the main premise of all cooperation!

The story is basically over! What I want to sum up is that he is so sure that there will be a future in such a way, why? You know, my eldest brother, as a post-70s, spent more than two months to run into trust with platform shareholders... The key point here lies in the prototype of the definition of the partnership model, not to talk about the conditions before you say? Although I can accept this approach, reason tells me that this is not what a big platform should be! Say yes first, then don't be annoyed, it can't be simpler! Shopping malls are so, the workplace is the same, at present many companies will also recruit talents in the partnership model, although they will talk about the rules, but most people's cognition is actually a low base salary, or even do not take the best salary, directly to the dry stock to participate in the enterprise dividend. The surface is deeply bundled, but in fact, it is also clearly squeezing the inherent value of talent. What do you think?