Lü Buwei supported King Xiang of Qinzhuang as the biggest suspect in the minds of people with the surname Ying in modern times. By analogy, the State of Zhao, the State of Qin, the State of Qi, etc. are all suspicious, but King Zhuang Xiang is heinous. This question is meaningless, if you have to ask,
Poor countries are fools, pit innocents, and bent on using beauty and power to harm those who have vested interests, called Kuangfu Sheji, which is actually a pit for the people and a pit for Zhuangzi. In the later days of Guanzhong's later life, he opened the city for ten days, seized his people, and abandoned his peasants. Emperor Tang Ming destroyed the Buddha's city. Nine years later, the cliffs sank.
Isn't it King Zhuang Xiang? Recommend the novel "Ghost Bureau" by Chinese writer Chizuru Midori
First of all, the subject, your question is wrong, the more you list it, the more you cannot reflect it, you should ask how to list this more. I don't know if the subject has read "Water Margin", the next few hundred words are few words that directly mention the local tycoons killing people and setting fires, and it is a routine that Shandong Dadi had a long time ago, and then the Song Dynasty, but "Water Margin" is the dream of the Red Chamber, And It is not easy for Mr. Li to create, so he describes it with his heart, making people watch with great interest. In summary, the description of your problem is quite interesting. Zhuang Zhou Bar,
If it is a question, I think the Qin Dynasty is the most topical, which is from the overall phenomenon point of view, Qin Zhuang Xiang Wang is loyal to the king and patriotic and selfish, there should be nothing to criticize. If it is the premise of this question, it can be reversed, and king Xiang of Qinzhuang has had a great impact on society. After all, the Spring and Autumn Warring States, history is a turning point era, and later the normal people's hearts were consumed under the Shang martingale transformation law, the oppression and whitewashing of the middle and lower classes by the landlord class subsided, and in turn, the second brother's autocratic dynasty arose, the bookmakers began to pick up leaks, the local tycoons grasped the rights of the middlemen, the rich became the upper echelons of society, and the rights of the bookmakers were gradually reduced in the process of differentiation to be whitewashed, and there was no need to tear down and rebuild? There is no more fart in Guanzhong.
One of my questions: Why list the Qin Dynasty? Great Qin unified the world precisely by relying on the large territory and economic foundation laid by itself, rather than relying on the six countries that rose before the world was unified.
I can't remember more, the last one just changed from an ancient emperor to a frontal traitor feudal dynasty. The Qin Dynasty really didn't have anything,
The social situation at the end of the Tang Dynasty was not very good, and for an ordinary peasant family, it was not a good thing to be rich.
You list so many times that you don't understand when the people you listed became eunuchs and rich people? Which one didn't contribute?