Collision of views丨 Reflection on "children's growth education" is not an excuse for crime

A submission originally written on May 31 was entitled "Compared with the death penalty, we should pay more attention to the growth and education of children", and the compilation and distribution of the title "19-year-old college students who dropped out of school were sentenced to death, how to avoid the "tragedy of growth"" caused a fierce discussion in the public comment area after the release of the red network "Green Pepper Project" and the Red Pepper Review WeChat public account. After thinking about it, I decided to write another review for this review.

When I first saw the news event, like all of you, I was shocked, then sad, then angry. But...... What about sadness and anger?

I began to think deeply about what was the deeper reason behind the events that triggered these kinds of events. Undoubtedly, the criminal's motive and criminal psychology are a point worth exploring. Then, if we can understand his motives for committing crimes and find the inevitability contained in them by chance, we may be able to bring certain social warnings and indoctrination effects, and we can prevent the occurrence of such cases.

Re-reading the news – the identity of the perpetrator as a left-behind child caught my attention.

In the message of the original review, some people think that the perpetrators are 19 years old and can be admitted to college, and then talk about the education of the original family, and think that the discussion is not very able to support the argument. I agree with the fact that "the argument is not very able to support the argument", because of the word limit of the article, if you want to retain other arguments, you will inevitably need to make trade-offs, which is also a helpless move! Due to the misunderstanding caused by the limitation of writing, it also confirms that there is indeed a lot of room for growth in writing articles. But I can't agree with the question of the family of origin at the age of 19 and having gone to college.

Leaving a message on this point of view actually confuses cultural quality with moral quality.

Academic qualifications are by no means equal to personal moral qualities! That's why we've been advocating quality education today. In fact, for most people, the role of the family in quality education accounts for a very large proportion, and there is an irreplaceable role in the cultivation of personal quality.

Yes, thinking that criminal acts in adulthood are related to the family of origin will make most people disagree, but I always believe that there is a connection between the two. If we have to cut ties between the two, I think it needs to be based on the premise that he is guided by a good family education.

If he has the correct guidance of his parents and family, then in the future, in the cognition of the world and things, he will have a general direction of progress, using these guidances he has received as the basis to know and perceive the world. However, for most left-behind children, they have very few opportunities to see their parents in a year, and there is a big gap in education and companionship in their growth. At the same time, it is not just a problem for left-behind children, it is even more deadly for all if the education and guidance are wrong. Therefore, the article hopes to take this opportunity to once again introduce the topic of "education and guidance", hoping to increase the attention and attention to it.

Before the formation of the three views of personal stability, these children can only understand the world according to the values they have explored, and they are easily adversely influenced and circled in the maze of errors that they think they are right.

The article believes that the impact of early childhood experience on the birth of a child is quite large, so it is advocated to pay more attention to children's growth education. However, the article does not deny that He's crime has the influence of many other factors at the same time, nor does it mean that He's crime is equated with his original family, left-behind children, etc. Just expounding this possibility, I hope it can play a warning role, and hope to bring reflection to today's family education. As for the misinterpretations, of course, there are reasons for the improper discussion of the article, but if these misinterpretations are attributed to the article, it is not objective.

The title of the article sparked a discussion that I did not expect. This is yet another demonstration of the importance of headlines in news commentary, and sometimes headlines are opinions.

In the news commentary on which the title was revised, if you discard the impact of the revised title and read the whole text carefully, you will find that the language tendencies in the text are mostly advocating for the importance of educational guidance in the development of young children, and have no intention of justifying the crime of robbery and murder.

The message said that there are also many left-behind children like him, without the company of their parents, without good education and guidance, and eventually become an excellent person by their own efforts, not a murderer. Yes, I have never denied this fact! However, it is not easy to carry things with thick virtue, to come out of the mud without staining, and to clean up and not to demonize.

Talking about the influence of external factors on people will excuse the perpetrator, and only talking about the internal self-cause will embark on the road of idealism. Therefore, in the original commentary, there is no assertion about the root cause of his crime, but only a single aspect is elaborated more, which leads to the initiative. The reason why everyone has objections to the article is actually because of this. Then, I hope that the comments of this review can play a complementary role in the original review.

Like most people, I thought that human nature was good when I was a child: "At the beginning of man, nature is good", but later, as I grew up slowly and came into contact with more things and knowledge, I thought that sex was inherently evil.

If you look at it, you will find that many of our good intentions in real life have actually been told or taught to do this, and it is right to do so. And occasionally the not-so-good ideas that come into our minds are never taught to us that they come out of nowhere...

Later, now, I think that there is no distinction between good and evil in the origin of human nature, that man is a complex intelligent creature, and that we are not so much a single "good body" or "evil body" as it is that we have both.

So, what kind of person will eventually become what we call a "good man," and who will become what we call an "evil man"? I believe that what separates the two is the correct education guidance in the process of growing up. Yes, we have compassion and kindness, but I think this good quality needs to be educated, guided and inspired.

There are messages saying that I have whitewashed the suspect, but I still can't agree with this statement, and some people say that there is no need to investigate the past of murderers, as for this kind of statement, I am not unable to agree, or even understand enough.

The relationship between readers and Hamlet, authors and readers, is vividly reflected in the comments below. But just like news commentary, there is discussion, there is commentary, there is communication to improve, which may be the charm of communication.

The collision of ideas and opinions is always so brilliant and wonderful!

Text/Lai Jianchao (Guangzhou Hua Business School)