"Sanda Kanji 14| Poor and Rich": The wealth of the chinese people, from ancient times to the present, has never escaped the land

"Poor" - "decibels" is "poor", dividing family property is "poor", dividing domestic production is "poor" and the country is "poor", money is given to others, and money is taken by people, then "poor".

"Gentlemen are poor and happy", why should a gentleman be "poor"? The "decibel" of a gentleman should not be understood as being willing to live in the situation of "poverty and lack of money", but refers to not being bound by money and wealth, and not being trapped by things outside the body, so that it is the true meaning of "the way of poverty and happiness".

Scatter the family property, take the money and people, and enter the realm of "poverty", and this "poverty" is the "poverty" of Gaoshi. "Do not be happy with things, do not grieve with yourself", return to the self-world, this is actually "rich". Only spiritual satisfaction is true "wealth."

"Rich" - "there is a field in the family", which is called "rich". In the era of farming, based on agriculture and living on the field, the so-called homeland is actually the land of the field, and the homeland is actually the "old field". In modern society, if there is a house, there is a house, there is land, and there is a land, so since ancient times, the Chinese people have money and become rich, they must buy land and buy a house. The wealth of the people of the country, from ancient times to the present, has never been able to escape the land.

"Ichiguchi field" means "rich". However, by pursuing the number of fields too much, we are caught up in the process of chasing wealth, and we go too far on the road of field by field, but we forget the original meaning of wealth. The more you go to the field, the more you feel that your mind is lacking. "One mouth field" is enough, and the wise man who knows the end is the wise. There are too many fields, why are there "rich"? If you have too much, won't you become "rich" and become "negative"? At this time, hurry up "decibels"!

To possess is "rich", to give up is to be "poor"; to possess is to be "poor", and to dare to give up is to be "rich". "Poor" and "rich" are so dialectically converted that you can't tell which is the real "poor" and which is the real "rich"!