"Meta-universe", the bottom is not a beautiful paradise

"Meta-universe", the bottom is not a beautiful paradise

In recent months, the concept of "metaverse" has been hotly speculated, according to investigations, the word metaverse, first derived from the American Neil Stephen in 1992 created the science fiction novel "Avalanche", but that English word translated as "metaverse", also unfolds the story of parallel worlds.

Personally is also more than thirty years of primary stage of science fiction fans, first of all, to talk about the view of parallel worlds, has always believed that the expression of "parallel universe", in the vast majority of the scenes depicted at the moment is actually not so accurate, aside from the content it contains, just say the concept of "parallel", if I remember correctly, any "parallel" thing is never intersecting. That is to say, any property contained in anything parallel to each other, even its respective rays, is parallel and does not intersect, and in this sense, anything parallel to us is theoretically invisible and undetectable. Therefore, even if parallel universes exist, and we, as relatively parallel ones, can never have any feelings and associations with each other. So I personally think that this concept should be called a "parallel universe" and should be more reasonable.

The concept of the metaverse is actually a technical means to truly perfectly embody the virtual scenes we have imagined, in the human sensory consciousness. From the perspective of scientific and technological progress, this is a very good thing, whether it is a variety of industry simulations, training experience, entertainment games, etc., it is simply a dream thing, no wonder Qian Lao gave a "spirit realm" name back then, beautiful.

However, the core point in the concept of the metaverse is in blockchain technology, that is, decentralization.

In terms of personal privacy security and system stability, blockchain technology is definitely an epoch-making initiative. Decentralization, however, is a problem that cannot be bypassed.

Decentralized and anarchic, is it the same thing?

Personally, I feel that as long as there is a lack of systematic regulation, that is one thing. Although every individual in the metaverse operates under some kind of rule, it seems to be no different from regulation, but there is a huge obstacle to the origin and targeting of events. The biggest application scenario of blockchain technology is nothing more than Bitcoin, and small partners who do not understand the details of its branches can find it on their own, and the comparison of the two will naturally be clear. And why China banned bitcoin is also clear at a glance. We can imagine that if the metaverse scene really landed, with its almost perfect realization of the real scene of the reengineering function, and based on the Internet's real-time information and communication capabilities, two transnational criminals lying on the bed of the north and south of the world, without any substantive communication, in the virtual scene with a completely different from reality, difficult to trace the identity, in the moment of passing by, a few eyes will explain things clearly, no evidence is left, how to arrest people, how to solve the case? Even if it is possible, its cost will increase exponentially (as for criminals in reality, they can also make eye contact, but there are specific practical scenarios, and it takes a specific process and time for two people to get together). This is just the simplest example, but it is extremely frightening to think about. Decentralization will be the biggest nightmare for those who maintain the legal system.

Moreover, can the metaverse and blockchain be truly decentralized? Who sets the rules, who are the developers, who are the system maintainers, and who are the owners of the technology? Let's not say whether it can be cracked, who dares to guarantee that the technical side, the developer, and the rule-maker will not leave any cat grease? Ten thousand steps back, can you guarantee that there will be no errors and loopholes? Who can guarantee... This center really doesn't exist! Ten thousand steps back, in this world, you can see and touch the "center", many people will not be truly convinced, but completely believe in the invisible and untouchable "center", is this a contradiction, or a paradox?

Zuckerberg's technical aspects are indeed ambitious, such as the technology of consciousness upload, which is another cornerstone of the metaverse and a more attractive place.

Outside the real world, people can upload their consciousness to an ideal country, without tiredness, without bothering, without even being tired, they can swim freely and experience the best life... It is true that human beings continue to move forward precisely because they have ambition, and they have the right and freedom to pursue better experiences. However, we return to the technical point of view, even if the consciousness upload technology is 100% safe, can the system architecture and hardware support that carry the entire virtual world ensure 100% security?

With the current technology of mankind, which one dares to say, it is certain that there will be no errors and problems one hundred percent. Pi has not yet been solved, and that circle will never be a circle called a circle! Some people will also say that some errors can be fault-tolerant, which individuals dare not refute, after all, human consciousness, brain, and body's fault tolerance rate and damage tolerance are how big, we do not know.

Some people will say, what is that, in case the network is disconnected, the item can not be online, but I am still me!

Naive... Consciousness can be uploaded, so will something be downloaded into your head?

Some people say well, isn't this the instant learning ability that people look forward to... Is it naïve, do you really think it's a good thing? Human knowledge is the inheritance of countless experiences in real life, and because of the different angles and understandings, a completely different independent individual will be formed, so you are you, I am me. Putting aside the technical security, when humans can learn instantaneously through this technology, the system also has the ability to delete the different ideas and knowledge that originally belonged to you in an instant... This should not be difficult to understand!

In short, the problem of the whole set of metaversities is not only a problem of technological innovation, but also a security problem involving all aspects, and it is also a widespread social problem.

Why doesn't the U.S. government bother with Zuckerberg doing this thing because it's a free prison that's very effective in reordering order... Just like Bitcoin, this thing can be bundled with us dollars, which is equivalent to US dollars, and there will only be a fixed total amount when it was said, but then it seems to change!