laitimes

In the workplace, don't think about eating by skill, many people have a deep misunderstanding of the skill

author:The Power Strategist

[Confused] I resigned today, was ostracized by a villain, a friend introduced me to look at this "power and wisdom" WeChat public account, there are even people who specialize in this, can't people rely on their ability to eat, have to play means?

【Analysis】Your friend can introduce you to come, which is also a chance. Oh, you may have a little misunderstanding about relying on your ability to eat:

1, the ability angle: the ability is not only to do things, but also to be a person.

Having the ability is not only to be able to deal with things yourself, but also to deal with interpersonal relationships. Marx said that man is the sum of social relations. One is social relations and one is sum. If the relationship cannot be handled, in fact, things will not be done well, because now everything is done collaboratively. Only a self-sufficient smallholder will think that he can handle everything alone. A loser who can't even beat his competitors, how can he have the ability? How can a person who can't be done by a small person have the ability? Just like Xu Jie of the Ming Dynasty, if he is not capable of defeating Yan Song and his son Yan Shifan, can he be called capable? The real high people are all people who do things and have a set.

2, the organizational perspective: the larger the platform, the less value will be valued.

Many people think that the larger the platform, the more capable people are needed, but this is actually a misunderstanding. A mature company will never rely on people who have the ability and ability, and will put their stability on the system and process. There are three main reasons here, first of all, a large company mature company, has its own fixed business and processes, these step by step on the line, no need to innovate. Secondly, if you innovate, there are also people with special R & D departments and majors, this is not a bachelor's degree can recognize themselves as talents and abilities. Finally, if large companies bet their operations on talent, then the flow of talent will pose a great threat to stability, which is not allowed by large platforms.

3, the power angle: disobedient, the superior will basically not give up the results.

There must be politics in a threesome. Moreover, the workplace is also a gathering place of interests, which involves the distribution of interests, and the distribution of benefits has never been based on the principle of fairness. From the perspective of power, disobedience will not let him produce results, mainly for three reasons: First, you are disobedient, give you the opportunity to produce results, it will be more difficult to manage in the future, and will form a demonstration effect, everyone is self-righteous, how should the leader be? Second, if you are given the opportunity to make achievements without any performance of allegiance, you will not be grateful, but will think that you have worked hard to get, the leader has no benefit, why help you? Third, you make achievements, not the leader of the person, after success, squeeze out the leader what to do?

Therefore, after our above analysis, it can be seen that a villain cannot be defeated, a loser, can not talk about what has the ability, and everyone can enter the same platform, the ability is basically the same, the difference is who brings greater benefits to power, rather than threats. And the organization will not pin its own development on someone capable, even if it is really needed, it will find someone to balance immediately after the crisis has passed, or expulsion, eliminating the possibility of future tail failure and potential risks. Therefore, just by feeling, people who think that the organization will only like to do things is actually a major misunderstanding, and not understanding the real workplace rules will be very miserable.

For more workplace articles, please pay attention to the WeChat public account "Wisdom of Power" - let the workplace take ten years less detours!

Read on