Welcome to the [Trend Epic] channel, today let's take a look at the following content. Time is rushing, and in the blink of an eye, 2020 has passed, and 10 years have passed since the first broadcast of Ghosh's director "Three Kingdoms". This is a star-studded big production, and under the condition that there were not many TV series episodes 10 years ago, it was already as high as 95 episodes. "Three Kingdoms" and Tang Guoqiang's version of "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" have a great difference, it is based on Luo Guanzhong's "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" as a model, but added some historical facts, plus some modern people's imagination and understanding of the Three Kingdoms.
The biggest gap between "Three Kingdoms" and "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" may be the depiction of Cao Cao, in the hands of director Gao Xixi, Cao Cao, played by Chen Jianbin, has become the first male protagonist of "Three Kingdoms", and even more from a traitor to a hero.
Why did Cao Cao have such a big change? Why is he no longer the traitor in the old version of "Romance of the Three Kingdoms"?
Director Gao Xixi once said that he no longer "respects Liu and degrades Cao", and wants Cao Cao to replace Liu Bei and become the male protagonist in his play. He believes that Cao Cao is not a villain, and he wants to give Cao Cao an objective evaluation.
So, what kind of existence was Cao Cao in history?
Is it a traitor? Is it a hero?
"Holding the Son of Heaven hostage to order the princes", "Entrusting the name of Han Xiang, but actually being a Han thief", son Cao Pi usurping Han... These are the reasons and reasons why Cao Cao was accused of being a traitor. Indeed, Cao Cao became a chancellor, and after he had great power, the Han family world was really cao family world, and he took advantage of the influence of Emperor Xian of Han on the class of scholars, recruited talents and scholars, and recruited talented celebrities and strategists to his own banner and served himself, while Emperor Xian of Han was emperor, but had no real power, just a living puppet.
However, the historical Cao Cao was indeed a capable man.
He has always been a minister before his death, never called the emperor, never founded the country, and the day he lived, Liu's Jiangshan still existed for a day.
The Three Kingdoms were an era of talented people, and there was no doubt that Cao Cao was a very good politician.
He implemented the "Tun Tian system", which could not only provide military food for Cao Cao's army, but also meet the food and clothing of these people, and greatly promoted the prosperity of his territory. He was not a thorough traitor, he could think of the common people, after grasping the actual power of the Eastern Han Dynasty, Cao Cao did not impose heavy taxes, but reduced the peasants' taxes, reduced the peasants' burdens, and thus won the support of the common people.
If he were a traitor outright, would he think of the common people?
The reason why Cao Wei was able to finally end the three kingdoms was greatly related to Cao Cao, who was a pioneer and a founder. Cao Cao had great talent and great personal charm, he was a meritocracy, appreciated talents, and promoted a large number of talents out of the ordinary.
Therefore, Cao Cao in "Three Kingdoms" is a relatively objective Cao Cao, not a blind traitor, blindly labeling him and painting his face.
Copyright notice: The code word is not easy to forward, please mark the source, and find plagiarism on the whole network to protect your rights. Some of the pictures from the Network if there is infringement, please contact us, we will delete it in time.