Wen \ Panda Brother
There is a public case in cultural history in which Confucius executed a man named Shao Zhengmu on the seventh day of his reign as the Grand Judge of the State of Lu. If the Great Sikou executes an official, it is not a big deal, the point is that this Shao Zhengmu is a competitor of Confucius.
Confucius received a wide range of disciples when he opened his doors to teach, with 3,000 disciples, of whom 72 were sages. But at that time, The State of Lu was not only Confucius himself who opened the school, but also Shao Zhengmu, who was also a celebrity of the State of Lu, and also opened the door to teach, and the disciples of Confucius and Shao Zhengmu came and went, learning on both sides, and even once Confucius's disciples except Yan Hui other disciples ran to Shao Zhengmu to listen to the lectures
Therefore, when Confucius killed Shao Zhengmu, there was a bit of a dispute between the sects and the source of life, and the meaning of unscrupulous means.
The eldest disciple Zilu was very puzzled, and even suspected that the teacher was abusing his power for personal gain and declaring a personal vendetta. And Confucius said a passage at that time, explaining why he wanted to kill Shao Zhengmu:,
Man has five evils, and theft is not the same. One is that the heart is safe and dangerous, the second is that the deeds are bold and firm, the third is that the words are false and argumentative, the fourth is that the memory is ugly and broad, and the fifth is that it is not easy to follow the wrongs, and these five, one for people, cannot be exempted from the curse of the gentleman, and the less is both good and bad. The former residence is enough to gather in groups. Words are enough to decorate the evil camp crowd, strong enough to be independent, and this villain's must not be blamed.
The basic meaning of this passage is that Shao Zhengmu has the ability to confuse the masses and must be killed
Then the netizens have to ask again, since the demons confuse the public, they must be killed? He did not really confuse the masses into rebellion.
This is somewhat "unwarranted", so netizens think of the disciple dispute between Confucius and Shao Zhengmu before, the dispute between schools, and scold Confucius as "Kong Lao'er used his power for personal gain", but is this really the case?
< h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" > what is the academic dispute between Confucius and Shao Zhengmu? </h1>
First, let's talk about Confucius's Confucianism. The Confucian school was originally the Western Zhou official school or Zhou Li (Confucius lived in the Eastern Zhou Dynasty), Confucius was born with a collapse of etiquette, the various princely states have not done things according to the Zhou rites, the Confucianism founded by Confucius is actually the Zhou Li, and what he pursued all his life was to restore the Zhou Li. There are six arts in the Zhou Li, liturgy, music, shooting, imperial court, book, and counting. These six arts are actually compulsory subjects for civil servants in the Western Zhou Dynasty. Many disciples may not have become gentlemen with Confucius, but learned how to be officials, and the 72 sages were 72 disciples who were proficient in the six arts.
Maybe I have a villain's heart, the most important thing in Confucianism is the hierarchy, which emphasizes each of them to their place. For example, to be a monarch is to be a monarch, to be a scholar is to be a scholar, and to be a farmer is to be a farmer. Then the world will be at peace.
There is no record in the history of Shao Zhengmu's school, but judging from Confucius's reflections, this should be a new school that is very critical of the Confucian school, and the most important thing is that there are still many people who are willing to listen and believe.
Let's summarize the characteristics of Shao Zhengmu, who can debate (can flicker), the audience loves to listen, is anti-traditional, and has many disciples (many believers). Isn't this a bit like a success guru or a cult or a peaceful evolution
You must know that Confucius's Confucianism did not learn to do nothing, but to learn to be an official, what kind of official to be. Shao Zhengmu was definitely in question about what kind of official he was and for whom he was an official. This is also an old question, why learn? Why the ultimate question of the revolution.
In the special era comic strip, Shao Zhengmu is awe-inspiring
Confucius was afraid that Shao Zhengmu would confuse the people and teach the bad people, so he quickly cut the mess and killed.
However, from the perspective of ruling the country according to law today, Shao Zhengmou is innocent. Because Shao Zhengmu did not specifically do what should be killed, but from Confucius's point of view, it was too late to wait for Shao Zhengmu to do anything, and an accident was a big thing.
Zhang Jiao of the Yellow Turban Rebellion of the Eastern Han Dynasty, hong Xiuquan of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom at the end of the Qing Dynasty, is what Shao Zhengmu may have to do.
Although many people in later generations expressed understanding for Confucius's murder of Shao Zhengmu, after all, Confucius made a bad start, after all, it is not certain whether Shao Zhengmu is the kind of person that Confucius said. Is it also possible that Confucius and Shao Zhengmu were politically at odds?
However, the doubts of netizens are also deserved, who called him Confucius and Shao Zhengmu were peers before.
However, Xiaobian believes that we can't reach the realm of Confucius and sometimes can't understand what Confucius did, for example, Confucius "knows that it cannot be done" is not something that ordinary people can do. And even if Confucius killed Shao Zhengmu with selfish intentions, it is definitely not a modern person who wants to grab the source of students and for tuition fees. Because Confucius accepted students only to collect a bundle of dried meat during the first visit, and later did not charge any tuition. If Confucius had selfish intentions, it was also a school of thought, and it was the dispute between reason and not money that modern people think.
Also, it is possible that Confucius killed Shao Zhengmu in history without this incident
< h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" > somewhat strangely recorded by Confucius</h1>
The story of Confucius killing Shao Zhengmu first appeared in "Xunzi", "Xunzi" was published 200 years after the confucius era, that is, modern people recorded the events of the Qianlong period, the key is that the authoritative history book of the Lu state written by Zuo Qiuming in the same era as Confucius, "Zuo Chuan", does not record that Confucius killed Shao Zhengmu, so how did Xunzi know about Confucius's killing of Shao Zhengmu 200 years later?
There are also early Mozi who are the most anti-Confucian, but the book "Mozi" does not record this matter. Another strange thing is that the Xunzi records a story of Sub-Production Deng Xuan and Shi Fu (Confucius highly respected Zi-Chan), which is almost a reproduction of Confucius's killing of Shao Zhengmu.
This may be a way for Xunzi to bring Confucius out to tell his point of view, just as Zhuangzi joked about Confucius at every turn.
Finally, let's talk about Confucius's record of Killing Shao Zhengmu, Sima Qian said that after Confucius killed the chaotic politician Shao Zhengmu, he ruled the country according to Confucius's method of governing the country and the great rule of the country, and the road did not pick up the night and did not close the house, and the soldiers did not bloodshed to recover the three cities from the State of Qi.
In the end, the State of Qi had to squeeze out Confucius with a counter-plot
#头条故事挑战赛 #