I remember my mother told us since I was a child that the first class of people taught with their eyes, the second class with their mouths, and the third class with their hands. It depends on how many people you are, how many people do you want to be?
According to what my mother said, then the third-class people teach it by hand, which is the so-called corporal punishment!
When it comes to the topic of education, some teachers educate students in a way that corporal punishment of students is at every turn.
The Ministry of Education has repeatedly ordered teachers not to use corporal punishment or disguised corporal punishment of students.
Not beating or insulting students is the minimum quality of a teacher.
Corporal punishment of students must be poor in donkey skills, and Jiang Lang is exhausted! Why did Confucius never physically punish students? Because he is the grandfather, at a high level!
This view has been refuted by many people.
Master Confucius's teaching philosophy: do not be angry, do not be angry, do not be angry, and give one corner instead of three corners, then it will not be repeated.
The meaning of this sentence is, if you don't want to learn, I won't teach, and if you don't think deeply, I won't talk deeply. I'll only talk about a part of one thing or something, and you'll be able to do all the other similar parts yourself, and you can't do that, and I won't teach it.
Let me ask, what kind of corporal punishment does Master Kong want?
Confucius's students are all people who are interested in learning, learn from Confucius as a teacher, and they all take the initiative to learn consciously. How can corporal punishment be needed?
If you really can't do it, you will either drop out of school by yourself or be expelled from the wall by Confucius. Why corporal punishment!
Nowadays, primary and junior high school students are all compulsory education, and they are passively forced to study regardless of whether they are reading materials or not. That's going to be hard.
You cannot withdraw from school or be expelled from school. Teachers struggle to teach, and students learn painfully. Can this be the same?
Some people say that teachers now think that corporal punishment of students still has educational value in this student.
I would like to say:
If corporal punishment is the ultimate solution, then why do our education experts bother to study education and teaching every year?
Education and teaching are never trivial, it is not that our children cannot do it, but that our parents and teachers have too high expectations for their children.
Looking at the students queuing up to see a doctor in the psychiatric hospital, looking at the students who were physically punished, don't you feel distressed? What's the point of rolling around?
In our day, teachers also used corporal punishment of students. In today's educational environment, corporal punishment of students is no longer appropriate because the era of corporal punishment is over. It's time for education to progress.
Students are not wood, they can carve whatever you want! Let's let them grow freely, and when they see something crooked, straighten it a little, but not too hard! Let the flowers become flowers, and let the trees become trees.
As the old saying goes, filial piety comes from under the stick. Parents can physically punish their children, but teachers cannot.
Between teachers and students, up to the point, we must grasp the scale and proportion, and punish appropriately!