laitimes

The director asked for advice, some film critics are disgusting, Li Chengru relies on the old to sell the old, and Bi Zhifei is very pitiful

author:Green Pencil 666

Now I have watched three episodes of "Director Please Advise" this program is mainly a program that is higher than the level of directors.

The judges are divided into public judges and so-called professional judges.

Today I watched a program directed by Bi Zhifei.

After watching it, I can only say that some film critics and so-called professionals are disgusting, really too capable of pretending

The director asked for advice, some film critics are disgusting, Li Chengru relies on the old to sell the old, and Bi Zhifei is very pitiful

What they say is their responsibility to tell the public that a movie is beautiful there.

Hearing this sentence I was disgusted to throw up.

Movies are watched by audiences from all walks of life, and their aesthetics are inferior to those of you, a so-called film critic.

You can be a professional film critic, you just say that it is your own feelings, don't move to guide the public aesthetics and the like, what can you guide?

That's just what you think is beautiful, so please don't pretend to compare it.

The director asked for advice, some film critics are disgusting, Li Chengru relies on the old to sell the old, and Bi Zhifei is very pitiful
The director asked for advice, some film critics are disgusting, Li Chengru relies on the old to sell the old, and Bi Zhifei is very pitiful

Those ugly, obscure and lengthy movies can be praised by these film critics to the sky - for this kind of person, it is mentally retarded.

The vast majority of people feel that rich, interesting, harmonious and joyful movies are scolded as worthless,—— for this kind of person who likes to add his own values to others, it is mentally retarded.

These film critics, two common features, that is:

1. Kneel and lick all foreign movies, especially European and American movies.

2. Touting Chinese movies that are said to be good to foreigners.

This means that they themselves have no aesthetic to judge the good or bad of a movie.

The director asked for advice, some film critics are disgusting, Li Chengru relies on the old to sell the old, and Bi Zhifei is very pitiful

I think that the good or bad of the whole movie is left to the public to judge.

Film critics don't affect any box office, they don't matter.

I think this issue of Bi Zhifei's work "Spring in a Small Town" is very good.

I can see it, and the picture is good.

Not stunning, but definitely decent.

However, it is very unbearable to be said by some people, saying that Bi Dao's use of the lens is unknown to him.

It's really hilarious.

Is Bi a director or an inventor? The use of a lens technology is for the purpose of shooting services, and everyone looks good on the line.

The director asked for advice, some film critics are disgusting, Li Chengru relies on the old to sell the old, and Bi Zhifei is very pitiful

There are also some examples of what Bi Dao's understanding of oriental aesthetics is wrong, and what lenses are also given.

What is oriental aesthetics, this person named Wang Dongxu I want to ask you.

You tell me, what is oriental aesthetics, please define it accurately, after you define it, see if other people disagree with what you say.

The director asked for advice, some film critics are disgusting, Li Chengru relies on the old to sell the old, and Bi Zhifei is very pitiful
The director asked for advice, some film critics are disgusting, Li Chengru relies on the old to sell the old, and Bi Zhifei is very pitiful

Finally, there is Li Chengru, who said that Bi Zhifei's work is not his own original, but a red mold.

Those who have watched this variety show know that the works shot by these directors are all adapted and required by the program team.

Li Chengru, you let Bi Zhifei go to the original, aren't you funny?

Read on