Text: Li Xingchao
Rating: 7.5
American western-themed film and television works are equivalent to our costume films, with a chivalrous complex in it, and there will be a few films released every year. In addition to the American drama "Westworld", there is also a movie in the previous year's work, "Heroic Seven Dragons".
I don't know if in recent years, the United States has become popular with the remake wave, "Heroic Seven Dragons" and "Westworld" are the same as the remakes. (Of course, the plot has been greatly changed)
I flipped through Baidu when writing this film review and found an interesting place. One of the protagonist actors in the 1960 version of The Dragon is The Man in Black in Westworld in 1973. I don't have time to look into any connection between them, but I hope anyone knows and tell me.
Stills from the 1960 version, it can be clearly seen that the first character actor is the Men in Black in the 1973 version of Westworld
The film is purely a work of heroic fantasism. Punishing evil and promoting good and justice is precisely to stimulate the "straight male cancer" factor in our men's blood (originally I wanted to use the term "big man"). And the aesthetics of violence and gun culture are also habitually stealing to the end. Every moment the heroes draw their pistols, the sound of each bullet coming out of the muzzle of the gun, greatly stimulates the expansion of men's blood vessels.
A local capitalist used force to force the villagers to sell their land for the sake of the village's minerals, and after the heroine's husband was killed, she resolutely sought a gunman to help. Then the male protagonist absorbs his companions on the road like a role-player, and finally collects seven Dragon Balls, no, seven tough guys. Control of the village was then taken from the corrupt town police, and the villagers were trained to fight and prepare for the enemy's coming. Finally defeat the enemy and sacrifice three of his companions.
Such a plot is decent. If you put it into reality, there are also many settings that are very unreasonable. In addition to the protagonist accepting the heroine's commission with a sense of revenge, the addition of several other personnel is also inexplicable. The enemy's forces are strong, and several companions of different identities have successfully entered the ranks through a simple "mouth escape". When fighting, the enemy is stupid anyway, and our protagonists have no friends in marksmanship.
Of course, this is a kind of romanticism, and since it is romanticism, don't talk about rationality and irrationality. No, no. In fact, as long as there are one or two unique masters among the design enemies in the plot design, and the protagonists are evenly matched, it will be much stronger.
Among the seven warriors, in fact, each of them has their own story, but there is not much reveal in the film, giving the audience the space to imagine themselves, which is a good setting.
As for the heroine, when she first appeared, she was amazed by her breasts, and I kept thinking about which one she would play with later, how to know that there was no such arrangement at all.
The heroine's breasts are really strong
Finally, I would like to mention the political correctness promoted in the film, the painting of the American star flag of the Indian boys, and the use of guns in their hands to drive away the invaders. Of course, there are also satires of the American system, such as the beginning of the villain said, in this country (the United States), democracy has always been equated with capitalism, capitalism is equal to God. This is to nakedly remind the world of the bloody history of the American big capital consortium, and to this day, it is still difficult to ask God to forgive.