The property "occupies" the original activity room for the elderly in the community
The old man's question is baseless?
Can the elderly activity room be "returned"?
Can the three solutions break the ice?
Delay in collecting the property fee,
Is it difficult to "adapt" between old habits and new orders?
At 21:05 today, Beijing Satellite TV's first social and people's livelihood program "Step Forward" of the country's first dialogue between citizens and the public sector will enter Buildings 9 to 13, Lugou Bridge North Lane, Wanping Street, Fengtai District, and invite residents, property companies and representatives of the three parties to gather at the scene to solve the problem of adapting to the "old habits" and "new order" here.
Buildings 9 to 13 in Lugou Bridge North Lane, Wanping Street, Fengtai District, were built in 1976, close to Wanping City, covering an area of 12,000 square meters, which was once the dormitory building of Shougang Refractory Factory, and is now a super-aging community. Why is this an ultra-aging community? Because the elderly over 60 years old account for 40% of the total population of the community, and the empty nest elderly, lonely and widowed elderly account for a higher proportion. At the end of 2016, Wanping Street renovated the old residential area of Buildings 9 to 13, and introduced property management in 2018. After the transformation of the old community, this seemingly clean and quiet and orderly community on the surface is actually "dark tide" in private.
Residents of the community reported that the elderly activity room, which was once built by the unit for retired workers, was "occupied" by the property; the property company said that there was no additional cost to rent office space. What are the facts? Who owns the original geriatric activity room? Is the property company illegally occupying, or is it fair use? How to solve the problem of property fees in the community?
Property and residents have their own opinions, who does the original elderly activity room belong to?
"Winter is coming soon, so we have a place to stay." This voice appeal touches people's hearts.
On the day of the program's recording, the temperature in Beijing fell below 0 degrees. In the face of the cold winter that is coming soon, the willingness of the elderly to "return" to the activity room for the elderly is becoming stronger and stronger. A group of elderly people in their eighties, when it comes to wind, rain and snow, but there is no warm indoor activity place. If such a scene happens all around us, how heart-wrenching it would be!
In the eyes of residents, the door sign says that the room of the activity station and the public reading room was once specially built for them by the unit, so why is it now "occupied" by the property? However, the residential property staff said that at that time, when the non-operating assets were handed over, the activity room was handed over to them in the form of an equipment room. With the "non-economic" transfer, the property rights of the activity room also belong to the superior enterprise of the property, so it is reasonable and legal for the property to use this activity room.
So what is a non-operating asset? Has your neighborhood ever experienced the same situation? After the transfer of "non-economics", what changes will occur in the community?
Less than 30,000 vs 500,000 or 600,000, how to solve the problem that the property cost of the old community cannot make ends meet?
At the scene of the recording of the program, the issue of the ownership of the original elderly activity room has been disputed. In the face of residents' doubts and incomprehension, the property company also expressed their grievances: the property fees for buildings 9 to 13 in lugou bridge north lane for one year follow the charging standards of the original property rights units, and the annual income is less than 30,000, but it needs to spend 500,000 to 600,000 yuan. In the past three years, why have property companies delayed raising their charging standards? Although residents also expressed their affirmation of the work done by the property, why did the residents also behave "righteously" when it came to the reasons for not paying the property fee?
In the post-"non-operational asset transfer" era, how to balance the contradiction between the actual needs of residents and modern property management?
One by one, the plan is proposed, and the residents oppose it, where should the elderly activity room go?
At the scene of the program recording, in order to meet the needs of the residents of the community for the elderly activity center, the property and the street staff discussed many times and proposed a number of plans. After many discussions, can there be a solution to unravel the knot that has plagued the property and residents for many years?
Does the community set up a senior activity room property out of affection or duty? Can residents accept the subsequent collection of property fees? Can the contradiction between the property company and the residents of the community be resolved? How should the supporting facilities after the transfer of non-operating assets in the old residential area be distributed?