Why Is Gad muller not the king of the ball

In the world of football, when it comes to the word "data", there is no way to avoid Gad Muller.

Gad müller is the greatest striker in the history of German football and world football, and a winner of the grand slam with collective and individual honors. He is the former world cup and former top scorer in European history. In 1998 he was awarded the FIFA Order of Gold. In 2000 FIFA awarded him the "Golden Boot of the Century" award. The Authoritative European sports media "Team Newspaper" also selected him as one of the ten greatest superstars in the history of football. In 2011, he was inducted into the International Football Hall of Fame.

In this era, we compare the relationship between the double petite and the king of the ball, and we like to say two things the most: one is to talk about the data, and the other is to talk about the World Cup.

Whether it is data or the World Cup, There is no shortage of Gad mueller. But he is still a long way from the king of the ball.

However, few voices cried out for him.

In terms of national team performance, Germany also has a Klose, the top scorer in World Cup history. But Klose's brilliance was only in the national team. And Gad muller has absolutely great statistics both in the national team and at the club.

Is this unfair to Gad muller? Why can't he even make it to the top five? Remember that in the glory days of Gad muller, there was such a so-called "authoritative evaluation": in addition to shooting, Gad muller was useless.

This is of course an unfair assessment, so what do people care more about in the traditional football selection preferences? - Except for the data.

What's the difference" with Gedmuller?

You can't talk about talent, because Gad muller is so extraordinary, you insist that he has no talent or lack of talent, that is naked "no face".

Still need to bring victory to the team? Probably not either, because Gad müller did it too.

Is it "dominance" in a team? Or, with that, Beckenbauer, compared Gad muller. Cruyff has this content, too. Not to mention maradona, the king of the ball.

Another one, it should be a "miracle"—a "non-human" interpretation of football.

Any data belongs to the material level of human beings. "Miracles," on the other hand, are content that exists at the level of the soul—not under the control of data.

The so-called "miracle", this content is an important content that can affect whether people appreciate or even worship a player. And the most terrible thing is that this content, there is no right or wrong, there is no fixed standard, it cannot be "standardized". There are only good and bad, and more subjective likes and dislikes.